From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: agcount for 2TB, 4TB and 8TB drives
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:31:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016223158.GK15067@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10d04693-02ef-427f-95fe-cc7bcaf3ec6f@scylladb.com>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:00:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 01:00 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:36:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>On 10/15/2017 01:42 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:13:24AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>Even better would be if XFS would detect the sequential write and
> >>start allocating ahead of it.
> >That's what delayed allocation does with buffered IO. We
> >specifically do not do that with direct IO because it's direct IO
> >and we only do exactly what the IO the user submits requires us to
> >do.
> >
> >As it is, I'm not sure that it would gain us anything over extent
> >size hints because they are effectively doing exactly the same thing
> >(i.e. allocate ahead) on every write that hits a hole beyond
> >EOF when extending the file....
>
> If I understand correctly, you do get momentary serialization when
> you cross a hint boundary, while with allocate ahead, you would not.
Allocate ahead still requires a threshold to be crossed to trigger
allocation. So it doesn't get rid of allocation, it just changes
what IO triggers it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 8:46 agcount for 2TB, 4TB and 8TB drives Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-10-06 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06 16:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-10-06 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-06 22:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-10-09 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-09 11:23 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 15:46 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-09 22:03 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-10 9:07 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-10 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-13 8:13 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-14 22:42 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-15 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-15 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-16 10:00 ` Avi Kivity
2017-10-16 22:31 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-10-18 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171016223158.GK15067@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).