From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: abort extended attribute list operation if btree is obviously weird
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:53:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024125336.GB56184@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024002824.GL5483@magnolia>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:28:24PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Abort an attribute list operation if the attr btree has obvious problems
> like loops back to the root or pointers don't point down the tree.
> Found by fuzzing btree[0].before to zero in xfs/402.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
> index 5816786..9f6fcc6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
...
> @@ -302,6 +306,30 @@ xfs_attr_node_list(xfs_attr_list_context_t *context)
> }
>
> dp->d_ops->node_hdr_from_disk(&nodehdr, node);
> +
> + /* Tree taller than we can handle; bail out! */
> + if (nodehdr.level >= XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH) {
> + xfs_trans_brelse(context->tp, bp);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
> +
> + if (cursor->blkno == 0) {
> + /*
> + * This is the root node, set up for the
> + * next level we want to see.
> + */
> + expected_level = nodehdr.level - 1;
> + } else if (expected_level != nodehdr.level) {
> + /*
> + * Not the level we were expecting, which
> + * implies that the tree is bad.
> + */
> + xfs_trans_brelse(context->tp, bp);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + } else {
> + expected_level--;
> + }
> +
It looks like we wouldn't catch the case of a two level tree having a
bad level, since we'd break out on leaf magic check above. Perhaps we
should check or assert that expected_level reaches 0? Otherwise looks Ok
to me.
Brian
> btree = dp->d_ops->node_tree_p(node);
> for (i = 0; i < nodehdr.count; btree++, i++) {
> if (cursor->hashval
> @@ -317,6 +345,10 @@ xfs_attr_node_list(xfs_attr_list_context_t *context)
> return 0;
> }
> xfs_trans_brelse(context->tp, bp);
> +
> + /* We can't point back to the root. */
> + if (cursor->blkno == 0)
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> }
> }
> ASSERT(bp != NULL);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 0:28 [PATCH] xfs: abort extended attribute list operation if btree is obviously weird Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-24 12:53 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-10-24 17:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024125336.GB56184@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).