From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40225 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751162AbdJYGTa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 02:19:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:19:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: remove xfs_bmbt_validate_extent
Message-ID: <20171025061929.GA4601@lst.de>
References: <20171023063017.11520-1-hch@lst.de> <20171023063017.11520-3-hch@lst.de> <20171023154119.GC5483@magnolia> <20171024075415.GA14823@lst.de> <20171025052426.GB20669@magnolia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171025052426.GB20669@magnolia>
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:24:26PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 09:54:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > By removing this, I think we no longer report corruption if we encounter
> > > 'unwritten' attr fork extents, which (AFAIK) aren't allowed.
> > 
> > True.  Oh well, skip this patch for now if you apply the rest, and
> > I'll have to do some gymnastics to keep it.
> 
> Ok.  I can try to fix it up in the patch stack tomorrow, but feel free
> to beat me to it. :P

Just discard all the patches but the first for now.