From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.g1.pair.com ([66.39.3.162]:34965 "EHLO mail1.g1.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbdJZPVl (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:21:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:21:44 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Possible to mount this XFS at least temporarily to retrieve files? Message-ID: <20171026172144.130ca6f8@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: References: <8d15394e-1dd6-ced0-7af1-fb538c60bb58@aei.mpg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/.NKNR5n0MkByc/t5+RK.XL3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Stefan Ring Cc: Carsten Aulbert , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/.NKNR5n0MkByc/t5+RK.XL3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:56:31 +0200 Stefan Ring =C3=A9crivait: > Anyway, it would be good to know if the RAID got mixed up somehow or > not. In the former case, I would kiss the data good bye. Otherwise it > should be recoverable, although it might be time consuming. The Adaptec RAID have a clear tendancy not to report overheating, but nonetheless badly eating data when doing so... --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --Sig_/.NKNR5n0MkByc/t5+RK.XL3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlnx/YgACgkQX3jQXNUicVYlEACgmYZ9Icjp+XEGYeq6AoMiQfFa pXYAn3wsAneHbTjHQ58V8MyWt4vlTaQ+ =Re0u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.NKNR5n0MkByc/t5+RK.XL3--