From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: flush the range before zero partial block range on truncate down
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101034639.GP17339@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171031225804.GF5858@dastard>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:58:04AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:53:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On truncate down, if new size is not block size aligned, we zero the
> > rest of block via iomap_truncate_page() to avoid exposing stale data
> > to user, and iomap_truncate_page() skips zeroing if the range is
> > already in unwritten status or a hole.
>
> Unless the page is in the page cache already, and then it gets
> zeroed in memory as part of truncate_setsize() call.
>
> > But it's possible that a buffer write overwrites the unwritten
> > extent, which won't be converted to a normal extent until I/O
> > completion, and iomap_truncate_page() skips zeroing wrongly because
> > of the not-converted unwritten extent. This would cause a subsequent
> > mmap read sees non-zeros beyond EOF.
>
> Yes, it should skip the zeroing on disk. The page in the page cache
> over the unwritten extent will be zeroed on read.
>
> The real question is this: where are the zeros in the page that fsx
> is complaining about?
The partial block that iomap_truncate_page() skipped zeroing was latter
written back to disk, and the punch_hole before mmap read invalidated
the page cache so mmap read from disk and saw non-zeros. This is a
hard-to-hit sequence, it took me almost 2000 iterations of generic/112
runs to hit one failure. I'll provide more details below.
>
> > I occasionally see this in fsx runs in fstests generic/112, a
> > simplified fsx operation sequence is like (assuming 4k block size
> > xfs):
>
> What should have is:
>
> > fallocate 0x0 0x1000 0x0 keep_size
>
> Unwritten, no data.
Yes, assuming 4k block size and 4k page size, unwritten extent with 1
block allocated, i_size stays 0.
>
> > write 0x0 0x1000 0x0
>
> Unwritten, contains data in page cache.
Exactly, and in-core i_size is 4k now, but on-disk di_size is still 0.
>
> > truncate 0x0 0x800 0x1000
>
> Unwritten, page contains data 0-0x800, zeros 0x800-0x1000
Yes, the page cache after truncate is correct. But before we zero the
page cache (in truncate_setsize()), we skipped zeroing the partial block
range 0x800-0x1000 and then triggered a writeback on range
[di_size, newsize], which was 0-0x800, and 0x800-0x1000 was written back
to disk too, which contained non-zeros.
(newsize(2k) > di_size(0) && oldsize(4k) != di_size(0)) was true.
if (did_zeroing ||
(newsize > ip->i_d.di_size && oldsize != ip->i_d.di_size)) {
error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, ip->i_d.di_size,
newsize - 1);
if (error)
return error;
}
>
> > punch_hole 0x0 0x800 0x800
>
> Unwritten, page contains zeros 0x0-0x1000
i_mapping had no pages (nrpages == 0) after punch_hole.
>
> > mapread 0x0 0x800 0x800
pagefault read block from disk, 0-0x7ff was zero, but 0x800-0xfff was
non-zero.
>
> Should map a page full of zeros as it is either a read over an
> unwritten extent or a hole, or it finds a page cache page that is
> fully zeroed.
>
> The only wrinkle in this is if the write is direct IO, but
> then the truncate would see a written extent and this whole problem
> doesn't occur.
>
> So, more info required. :P
Above is what I observed in debugging, maybe I should have provided more
details in the first place. (I did add some comments to the fstests case
though..).
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 12:53 [PATCH] xfs: flush the range before zero partial block range on truncate down Eryu Guan
2017-10-28 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-31 10:09 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-31 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-31 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-31 22:58 ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-01 3:46 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-11-01 4:44 ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-01 12:06 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171101034639.GP17339@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).