linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: truncate pagecache before writeback in xfs_setattr_size()
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:39:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171102123912.GA16645@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171101140540.21542-1-eguan@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:05:40PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On truncate down, if new size is not block size aligned, we zero the
> rest of block to avoid exposing stale data to user, and
> iomap_truncate_page() skips zeroing if the range is already in
> unwritten state or a hole. Then we writeback from on-disk i_size to
> the new size if this range hasn't been written to disk yet, and
> truncate page cache beyond new EOF and set in-core i_size.
> 
> The problem is that we could write data between di_size and newsize
> before removing the page cache beyond newsize, as the extents may
> still be in unwritten state right after a buffer write. As such, the
> page of data that newsize lies in has not been zeroed by page cache
> invalidation before it is written, and xfs_do_writepage() hasn't
> triggered it's "zero data beyond EOF" case because we haven't
> updated in-core i_size yet. Then a subsequent mmap read could see
> non-zeros past EOF.
> 
> I occasionally see this in fsx runs in fstests generic/112, a
> simplified fsx operation sequence is like (assuming 4k block size
> xfs):
> 
>   fallocate 0x0 0x1000 0x0 keep_size
>   write 0x0 0x1000 0x0
>   truncate 0x0 0x800 0x1000
>   punch_hole 0x0 0x800 0x800
>   mapread 0x0 0x800 0x800
> 
> where fallocate allocates unwritten extent but doesn't update
> i_size, buffer write populates the page cache and extent is still
> unwritten, truncate skips zeroing page past new EOF and writes the
> page to disk, punch_hole invalidates the page cache, at last mapread
> reads the block back and sees non-zero beyond EOF.
> 
> Fix it by moving truncate_setsize() to before writeback so the page
> cache invalidation zeros the partial page at the new EOF. This also
> triggers "zero data beyond EOF" in xfs_do_writepage() at writeback
> time, because newsize has been set and page straddles the newsize.
> 
> Also fixed the wrong 'end' param of filemap_write_and_wait_range()
> call while we're at it, the 'end' is inclusive and should be
> 'newsize - 1'.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
> ---
> 

Thanks for the nice explanation. This looks Ok to me:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

> v2:
> - fix the bug by moving truncate_setsize() before writeback as suggested
>   by Dave
> - update summary and commit log accordingly, with some words stolen from
>   Dave :)
> 
> v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg12321.html
> 
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 17081c77ef86..f24e5b6cfc86 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -886,22 +886,6 @@ xfs_setattr_size(
>  		return error;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * We are going to log the inode size change in this transaction so
> -	 * any previous writes that are beyond the on disk EOF and the new
> -	 * EOF that have not been written out need to be written here.  If we
> -	 * do not write the data out, we expose ourselves to the null files
> -	 * problem. Note that this includes any block zeroing we did above;
> -	 * otherwise those blocks may not be zeroed after a crash.
> -	 */
> -	if (did_zeroing ||
> -	    (newsize > ip->i_d.di_size && oldsize != ip->i_d.di_size)) {
> -		error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
> -						      ip->i_d.di_size, newsize);
> -		if (error)
> -			return error;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
>  	 * We've already locked out new page faults, so now we can safely remove
>  	 * pages from the page cache knowing they won't get refaulted until we
>  	 * drop the XFS_MMAP_EXCL lock after the extent manipulations are
> @@ -917,9 +901,29 @@ xfs_setattr_size(
>  	 * user visible changes). There's not much we can do about this, except
>  	 * to hope that the caller sees ENOMEM and retries the truncate
>  	 * operation.
> +	 *
> +	 * And we update in-core i_size and truncate page cache beyond newsize
> +	 * before writeback the [di_size, newsize] range, so we're guaranteed
> +	 * not to write stale data past the new EOF on truncate down.
>  	 */
>  	truncate_setsize(inode, newsize);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We are going to log the inode size change in this transaction so
> +	 * any previous writes that are beyond the on disk EOF and the new
> +	 * EOF that have not been written out need to be written here.  If we
> +	 * do not write the data out, we expose ourselves to the null files
> +	 * problem. Note that this includes any block zeroing we did above;
> +	 * otherwise those blocks may not be zeroed after a crash.
> +	 */
> +	if (did_zeroing ||
> +	    (newsize > ip->i_d.di_size && oldsize != ip->i_d.di_size)) {
> +		error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
> +						ip->i_d.di_size, newsize - 1);
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
> +	}
> +
>  	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-02 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-01 14:05 [PATCH v2] xfs: truncate pagecache before writeback in xfs_setattr_size() Eryu Guan
2017-11-02  0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-02 12:39 ` Brian Foster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171102123912.GA16645@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).