linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: WTF? Re: [PATCH] License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 00:53:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171109085324.GA4909@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171109082335.GD27461@kroah.com>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:23:35AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The documentation of this process is lagging the patches, as usually
> happens, sorry about that.

In cases like this the documentation is the most important part.
Without documentation it is completely pointless.

> 
> Thomas is working on a document to describe the process, and what a file
> should contain, based on the work he has been doing.  This was discussed
> at the kernel summit, and sorry for it not getting out wider than that
> audience, things take time, which is why I was only touching my
> subsystems with the "general license cleanups" at the moment until his
> document was ready.
> 
> Hopefully a draft of it will go out today, Thomas?

It would help to Cc him, I've done that. 

> SPDX is an industry-wide accepted set of tags for all licenses, some
> projects have been using it for years (like Uboot).  These are not going
> to change randomly, and again, the document that Thomas has will
> describe these in detail.

It is not an 'industry-wide accepted set of tags' (did you get a company
discount on buzzwords).  Yes, it it a scheme someone can up with (seems
like an industry consortium that happens to employ you, what a
coincidence), and from a quick look it even seems like a pretty reasonable
scheme.  But without backing it with an explanation of those tags in
the tree, and explaining people how to use them and how they are
relevant it is absolutely useless.

And to come up with a scheme we need to have a broad discussion on
what we are doing.

> sorry for the confusion, it was not intended at all, but it what happens
> in time with distributed developers, all working at different rates on
> different parts of the tree.

Sorry but I call bullshit on this.  We have absolutely no problem
working together if we try.  You clearly did not even try to cooperate
with anyone - the clear indicator is that no RFC was posted, no
questions were asked but you just sent a pull requests right before
the end of the merge window.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-09  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-07  2:06 [PATCH] License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-07  7:20 ` WTF? " Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07  7:39   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-07 17:07     ` Alan Cox
2017-11-07 17:12       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-07 17:25         ` Alan Cox
2017-11-07 18:30           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-07 17:20     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-07 18:29       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-07 18:46         ` Alan Cox
2017-11-07 19:15           ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-07 19:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-07 20:26               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-07 21:42                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-08  6:37                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-08 17:19                   ` Alan Cox
2017-11-08 18:46                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-09  8:19                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-08 12:35               ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-08 15:11                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-08 18:06                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-09  8:23                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-09  8:53                     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-11-22 17:07                 ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-22 17:53                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-25 19:12                     ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-25 21:57                       ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 16:50                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-22 16:19             ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-08 23:47         ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-09  8:16           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-10 21:10             ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171109085324.GA4909@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).