From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:38424 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754316AbdKNKPd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 05:15:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:15:16 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] LICENSES: Add documentation and initial License files Message-ID: <20171114101516.GN12318@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20171112191821.240484206@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171112191821.240484206@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 08:18:21PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Folks! > > First of all I want to apologize for the suboptimal process which brought > this initial SPDX annotation into the kernel. We surely should have posted > exactly this patch series first, but we were too focused on the actual > annotation and analysis work, which took place in the last 10 months. As is > happens often with work which occupies one on the 'technical' level > completely, documentation is the last thing to think of. Hi Thomas, Thank you for doing this, this addresses many of my concerns with the SPDX license tagging. For the series: Acked-by: Russell King As for the comment style, I'm sure that we'll eventually learn to use the appropriate style for the file type, but I suspect it won't be easy as it's not intuitive. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up