From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:41322 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934397AbdKPPHZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:07:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:07:23 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses Message-ID: <20171116080723.279591c8@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20171112192142.525567667@linutronix.de> References: <20171112191821.240484206@linutronix.de> <20171112192142.525567667@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kate Stewart On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 20:18:22 +0100 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/license-rules.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@ > +Linux kernel licensing rules > +============================ > + > +The Linux Kernel is provided under the terms of the GNU General Public > +License version 2 only (GPL-2.0), as published by the Free Software > +Foundation, and provided in the COPYING file. This documentation file is One other thing that occurred to me is that documentation files, too, are copyrightable and should have license identifiers. So maybe the documentation on these identifiers should set a good example :) The RST version would be: .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 I'll try to find some time to start fixing up Documentation/ in general. jon