linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Jonas Oberg <jonas@fsfe.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:29:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117122924.GA21988@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOFm3uGptVog2ZRx+Wh_330=g=sM02Lgi_f2t3R1CSKy1Gp2ug@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:37:28AM +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> >> Or fix the non-standard redefinition of the MODULE_LICENSE macro as
> >> DRIVER_LICENSE as in [2]  and found elsewhere with
> >> grep -r . -e "DRIVER_LICENSE"
> >>
> >> These break the otherwise nicely grepable MODULE_LICENSE macros
> >> with this kind of warty redirection I stumbled upon while reviewing kernel
> >> license scans:
> >>
> >> #define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> >> [...]
> >> MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> >
> > Yes, those should be cleaned up, there's only 11 instances of them,
> > should be simple enough to do.  I can knock up a patch series for
> > them...
> 
> That would be awesome and you are probably a million times faster than
> me at that.
> 
> There are actually more like 29 locations with such an oddity around AFAIK.
> 
> Here is a better, more comprehensive grep:
> 
> egrep  "MODULE_LICENSE\([^\"]|DRIVER_LICENSE|DRV_LICENSE|MOD_LICENSE"
> -r . | egrep -v
> "module\.h|nand_ecc\.c|Documentation|scripts|az6007\.c|mt2063.c"
> 
> yielding these:
> 
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "Dual BSD/GPL"
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "Dual BSD/GPL"
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_pingpong.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "Dual BSD/GPL"
> ./drivers/ntb/test/ntb_pingpong.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/ntb/ntb.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "Dual BSD/GPL"
> ./drivers/ntb/ntb.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/input/tablet/hanwang.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE  "GPL"
> ./drivers/input/tablet/hanwang.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/input/tablet/kbtab.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/input/tablet/kbtab.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/input/tablet/acecad.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/input/tablet/acecad.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/input/misc/keyspan_remote.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/input/misc/keyspan_remote.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/net/usb/hso.c:#define MOD_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/net/usb/hso.c:MODULE_LICENSE(MOD_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_init.c:MODULE_LICENSE(CSIO_DRV_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_init.h:#define CSIO_DRV_LICENSE "Dual BSD/GPL"
> ./drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision-video.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision-video.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL"
> ./drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE);
> ./include/linux/raid/pq.h:#define MODULE_LICENSE(licence)

Thanks, I think I got all of these, but that last one should be left
alone, it's ok and for when the code is being built outside of the
kernel tree.

I'll send the patches out this afternoon.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-12 19:18 [patch 0/7] LICENSES: Add documentation and initial License files Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:54   ` Joe Perches
2017-11-12 19:57     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 20:07   ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-12 20:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-13 10:04   ` [1/7] " Charlemagne Lasse
2017-11-13 12:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-13 12:40       ` Charlemagne Lasse
2017-11-13 13:26         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-16 15:07   ` [patch 1/7] " Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-16 15:15     ` Jonas Oberg
2017-11-16 18:03       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17  7:37       ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-17  8:57         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-17 10:53           ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-17 12:29             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 2/7] LICENSES: Add the GPL 2.0 license Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-14 18:02   ` Rob Herring
2017-11-14 19:05     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-11-16 11:46   ` Jonas Oberg
2017-11-16 13:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 3/7] LICENSES: Add the GPL 1.0 license Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 4/7] LICENSES: Add the BSD 2-clause "Simplified" license Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 5/7] LICENSES: Add the BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 6/7] LICENSES: Add the MIT license Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 19:18 ` [patch 7/7] LICENSES: Add Linux syscall note exception Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-12 20:02 ` [patch 0/7] LICENSES: Add documentation and initial License files Joe Perches
2017-11-12 20:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-13 13:54 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-14 10:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117122924.GA21988@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jonas@fsfe.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).