* [PATCH v3 0/3] fix failures caused by mount error msg change in util-linux v2.30 @ 2017-11-23 11:10 Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE Eryu Guan ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests; +Cc: misono.tomohiro, linux-xfs, amir73il, Eryu Guan util-linux v2.30 changed mount error message again and caused several tests to fail (reported by Misono Tomohiro, thanks!), this is mainly due to two util-linux commits in v2.30-rc1 6dede2f2f7c5 libmount: support MS_RDONLY on write-protected devices ea848180dd34 libmount: add mnt_context_get_excode() This patchset introduced _filter_ending_dot, _filter_error_mount and _filter_busy_mount and improved _filter_ro_mount to deal with all these output differences between old and new util-linux versions. I've tested and confirmed generic/050, xfs/005 and overlay/03[567] all passed with both old and new util-linux. xfs/333 is always _notrun because there's no realtime-rmapbt support yet. Thanks, Eryu v3: - address Amir's review comments, detailed change log goes to each patch v2: - remove not-needed _filter_scratch from tests Eryu Guan (3): fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE overlay/036: filter busy mount message fstests: filter readonly mount error messages common/filter | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- tests/generic/050 | 8 ++--- tests/generic/050.out | 8 ++--- tests/overlay/035 | 4 +-- tests/overlay/035.out | 4 +-- tests/overlay/036 | 4 +-- tests/overlay/036.out | 4 +-- tests/overlay/037 | 4 +-- tests/overlay/037.out | 4 +-- tests/xfs/005 | 7 +---- tests/xfs/333 | 2 +- tests/xfs/333.out | 2 +- 12 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.14.3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/3] fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE 2017-11-23 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix failures caused by mount error msg change in util-linux v2.30 Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] overlay/036: filter busy mount message Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages Eryu Guan 2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests; +Cc: misono.tomohiro, linux-xfs, amir73il, Eryu Guan util-linux commit ea848180dd34 ("libmount: add mnt_context_get_excode()") since v2.30 changed the error message on EUCLEAN and ESTALE again (and maybe other errno too): - mount: <device> on <mountpoint> failed: Structure needs cleaning + mount: <mountpoint>: mount(2) system call failed: Structure needs cleaning. and it causes xfs/005, overlay/037 to fail (and probably xfs/333 too, but it's always _notrun for now). And what's more, the mentioned tests would also fail when testing with util-linux prior to v2.21, no one complained just because the tests are usually _notrun on such old distributions that ship util-linux < v2.21. So let's filter out the changing parts and keep the error message simple. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- v3: - update commit log to mention potential test failure using util-linux < v2.21 - document the filtered format as comments common/filter | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/overlay/037 | 4 ++-- tests/overlay/037.out | 4 ++-- tests/xfs/005 | 7 +------ tests/xfs/333 | 2 +- tests/xfs/333.out | 2 +- 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter index 0cb458b0051f..0d3875cc6cdc 100644 --- a/common/filter +++ b/common/filter @@ -390,6 +390,13 @@ _filter_fstrim() egrep -o "[0-9]+ bytes" | $AWK_PROG '{print $1}' } +# Remove the ending dot appended to mount error message, util-linux 2.30 +# starts to do so. +_filter_ending_dot() +{ + sed -e "s/\.$//" +} + # Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices # It's gone in newer versions _filter_ro_mount() { @@ -397,6 +404,25 @@ _filter_ro_mount() { -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" } +# Filter a failed mount output due to EUCLEAN and USTALE, util-linux changed +# the message several times. +# +# prior to v2.21: +# mount: Structure needs cleaning +# v2.21 to v2.29: +# mount: mount <device> on <mountpoint> failed: Structure needs cleaning +# v2.30 and later: +# mount: <mountpoint>: mount(2) system call failed: Structure needs cleaning. +# +# This is also true for ESTALE error. So let's remove all the changing parts +# and keep the 'prior to v2.21' format: +# mount: Structure needs cleaning +# mount: Stale file handle +_filter_error_mount() +{ + sed -e "s/mount:\(.*failed:\)/mount:/" | _filter_ending_dot +} + _filter_od() { BLOCK_SIZE=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) diff --git a/tests/overlay/037 b/tests/overlay/037 index 728732903358..6710ddaf4802 100755 --- a/tests/overlay/037 +++ b/tests/overlay/037 @@ -76,12 +76,12 @@ $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT # Try to mount an overlay with the same upperdir and different lowerdir - expect ESTALE _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir -oindex=on \ - 2>&1 | _filter_scratch + 2>&1 | _filter_error_mount $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT 2>/dev/null # Try to mount an overlay with the same workdir and different upperdir - expect ESTALE _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir2 $workdir -oindex=on \ - 2>&1 | _filter_scratch + 2>&1 | _filter_error_mount $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT 2>/dev/null # Mount overlay with original lowerdir, upperdir, workdir and index=on - expect success diff --git a/tests/overlay/037.out b/tests/overlay/037.out index 786ef85c29e3..d6ad7cfad687 100644 --- a/tests/overlay/037.out +++ b/tests/overlay/037.out @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 037 -mount: mount SCRATCH_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT failed: Stale file handle -mount: mount SCRATCH_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT failed: Stale file handle +mount: Stale file handle +mount: Stale file handle diff --git a/tests/xfs/005 b/tests/xfs/005 index fade4bbf282b..ebf4b15ec9b5 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/005 +++ b/tests/xfs/005 @@ -40,11 +40,6 @@ _cleanup() rm -f $tmp.* } -filter_mount() -{ - sed -e "s/mount .* failed: //" -} - # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter @@ -64,7 +59,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs_xfs -m crc=1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 224 4" -c fsync $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io # should FAIL, the crc is bad; golden output contains mount failure -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | filter_mount +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_error_mount # success, all done status=0 diff --git a/tests/xfs/333 b/tests/xfs/333 index bf0c811d2435..2f394feda6c9 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/333 +++ b/tests/xfs/333 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ _scratch_unmount echo "Corrupt fs" _scratch_xfs_db -x -c 'sb 0' -c "write rrmapino $ino" >> $seqres.full -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_error_mount echo "Test done, mount should have failed" diff --git a/tests/xfs/333.out b/tests/xfs/333.out index f7518f46d900..b3c698750f8f 100644 --- a/tests/xfs/333.out +++ b/tests/xfs/333.out @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ QA output created by 333 Format and mount Create some files Corrupt fs -mount: mount SCRATCH_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT failed: Structure needs cleaning +mount: Structure needs cleaning Test done, mount should have failed -- 2.14.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] overlay/036: filter busy mount message 2017-11-23 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix failures caused by mount error msg change in util-linux v2.30 Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages Eryu Guan 2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests; +Cc: misono.tomohiro, linux-xfs, amir73il, Eryu Guan util-linux v2.30 changed error message of a busy mount and caused overlay/036 to fail. e.g. - mount: <device> is already mounted or <mountpoint> busy + mount: <mountpoint>: <device> already mounted or mount point busy. Filter the mount output by a newly introduced _filter_busy_mount into a unified format. mount: device already mounted or mount point busy Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- v3: - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output - update regexp in sed as suggested by Amir common/filter | 12 ++++++++++++ tests/overlay/036 | 4 ++-- tests/overlay/036.out | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter index 0d3875cc6cdc..a212c09aa138 100644 --- a/common/filter +++ b/common/filter @@ -423,6 +423,18 @@ _filter_error_mount() sed -e "s/mount:\(.*failed:\)/mount:/" | _filter_ending_dot } +# Similar to _filter_error_mount, filter a busy mount output. +# Turn both old (prior to util-linux v2.30) and new (v2.30 and later) format to +# a simple one. e.g. +# old: mount: <device> is already mounted or <mountpoint> busy +# new: mount: <mountpoint>: <device> already mounted or mount point busy. +# filtered: mount: device already mounted or mount point busy +_filter_busy_mount() +{ + sed -e "s/.*: .* already mounted or .* busy/mount: device already mounted or mount point busy/" | \ + _filter_ending_dot +} + _filter_od() { BLOCK_SIZE=$(_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) diff --git a/tests/overlay/036 b/tests/overlay/036 index 544d4e4eaa87..e0c13ae88c92 100755 --- a/tests/overlay/036 +++ b/tests/overlay/036 @@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ _overlay_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir2 $workdir \ # Try to mount another overlay with the same upperdir # with index=on - expect EBUSY _overlay_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir2 \ - overlay2 $SCRATCH_MNT -oindex=on 2>&1 | _filter_scratch + overlay2 $SCRATCH_MNT -oindex=on 2>&1 | _filter_busy_mount # Try to mount another overlay with the same workdir # with index=on - expect EBUSY _overlay_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir2 $workdir \ - overlay3 $SCRATCH_MNT -oindex=on 2>&1 | _filter_scratch + overlay3 $SCRATCH_MNT -oindex=on 2>&1 | _filter_busy_mount # success, all done diff --git a/tests/overlay/036.out b/tests/overlay/036.out index 51746114db1c..0d266f1b216e 100644 --- a/tests/overlay/036.out +++ b/tests/overlay/036.out @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 036 -mount: overlay2 is already mounted or SCRATCH_MNT busy -mount: overlay3 is already mounted or SCRATCH_MNT busy +mount: device already mounted or mount point busy +mount: device already mounted or mount point busy -- 2.14.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-23 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix failures caused by mount error msg change in util-linux v2.30 Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] overlay/036: filter busy mount message Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-24 5:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Eryu Guan 2 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests; +Cc: misono.tomohiro, linux-xfs, amir73il, Eryu Guan util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only block device, and in the failure case printed one line message instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new util-linux versions. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- v3: - document the filtered format in comments - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 common/filter | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- tests/generic/050 | 8 ++++---- tests/generic/050.out | 8 ++++---- tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter index a212c09aa138..6140b331017f 100644 --- a/common/filter +++ b/common/filter @@ -399,9 +399,53 @@ _filter_ending_dot() # Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices # It's gone in newer versions +# +# And util-linux v2.30 changed the output again, e.g. +# for a successful ro mount: +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. +# +# a failed ro mount: +# prior to v2.30: +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only +# v2.30 and later: +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. +# +# a failed rw remount: +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. +# +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: +# +# successful ro mount: +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +# +# failed ro mount: +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +# mount: cannot mount read-only +# +# failed rw remount: +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected _filter_ro_mount() { - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" + perl -ne ' + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { + # successful ro mount + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; + print "mount: cannot mount read-only\n"; + } elsif (/(^mount: cannot mount) .* (read-only$)/) { + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount + print "$1 $2\n"; + } elsif (/mount:.* cannot remount .* read-write.*/) { + # failed rw remount + print "mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected\n"; + } else { + print "$_"; + }' | _filter_ending_dot } # Filter a failed mount output due to EUCLEAN and USTALE, util-linux changed diff --git a/tests/generic/050 b/tests/generic/050 index 5fa28a7648e5..efa45f04825b 100755 --- a/tests/generic/050 +++ b/tests/generic/050 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV # Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again # echo "mounting read-only block device:" -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)" touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV # -o norecovery is used. # echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:" -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" -_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ending_dot # # This is the way out if the underlying device really is read-only. @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch # data recovery hack. # echo "mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:" -_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch diff --git a/tests/generic/050.out b/tests/generic/050.out index fb90f6ea5819..2187d16fa328 100644 --- a/tests/generic/050.out +++ b/tests/generic/050.out @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ QA output created by 050 setting device read-only mounting read-only block device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail) touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system unmounting read-only filesystem @@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ going down: unmounting shutdown filesystem: setting device read-only mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only -mount: cannot mount SCRATCH_DEV read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: cannot mount read-only unmounting read-only filesystem umount: SCRATCH_DEV: not mounted mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only unmounting read-only filesystem setting device read-write mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro: diff --git a/tests/overlay/035 b/tests/overlay/035 index 64fcd708105e..05447741a1ba 100755 --- a/tests/overlay/035 +++ b/tests/overlay/035 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ mkdir -p $lowerdir1 $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir $MOUNT_PROG -t overlay -o"lowerdir=$lowerdir2:$lowerdir1" \ $OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT # Make workdir immutable to prevent workdir re-create on mount @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ $CHATTR_PROG +i $workdir # Verify that overlay is mounted read-only and that it cannot be remounted rw. _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar 2>&1 | _filter_scratch -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount # success, all done status=0 diff --git a/tests/overlay/035.out b/tests/overlay/035.out index 5a5f67771402..e08ba2ebc691 100644 --- a/tests/overlay/035.out +++ b/tests/overlay/035.out @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 035 touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/bar': Read-only file system -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected -- 2.14.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 13:34 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 14:09 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-24 5:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Eryu Guan 1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-23 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. > > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new > util-linux versions. > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > --- > v3: > - document the filtered format in comments > - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well > - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output > - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 > > common/filter | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > tests/generic/050 | 8 ++++---- > tests/generic/050.out | 8 ++++---- > tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- > tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- > 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter > index a212c09aa138..6140b331017f 100644 > --- a/common/filter > +++ b/common/filter > @@ -399,9 +399,53 @@ _filter_ending_dot() > > # Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices > # It's gone in newer versions > +# > +# And util-linux v2.30 changed the output again, e.g. > +# for a successful ro mount: > +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. > +# > +# a failed ro mount: > +# prior to v2.30: > +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only > +# v2.30 and later: > +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. > +# > +# a failed rw remount: > +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. > +# > +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new > +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: > +# > +# successful ro mount: > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > +# > +# failed ro mount: > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > +# mount: cannot mount read-only > +# > +# failed rw remount: > +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected > _filter_ro_mount() { > - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ > - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" > + perl -ne ' > + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { > + # successful ro mount > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { > + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; Leftover copy&paste line? > + print "mount: cannot mount read-only\n"; > + } elsif (/(^mount: cannot mount) .* (read-only$)/) { > + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount > + print "$1 $2\n"; Maybe I am missing something, but why are you printing arguments when you know what the expected output should be? Also, in what is that match expression different from the v2.30 format? Can't you merge both cases to use the more generic match expr (without .*:) and print the expected result? > + } elsif (/mount:.* cannot remount .* read-write.*/) { > + # failed rw remount > + print "mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected\n"; > + } else { > + print "$_"; > + }' | _filter_ending_dot > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-23 13:34 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 14:09 ` Eryu Guan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-23 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: >> util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on >> write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only >> block device, and in the failure case printed one line message >> instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), >> and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. >> >> Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating >> associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new >> util-linux versions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> >> --- >> v3: >> - document the filtered format in comments >> - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well >> - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output >> - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 >> >> common/filter | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> tests/generic/050 | 8 ++++---- >> tests/generic/050.out | 8 ++++---- >> tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- >> tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- >> 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter >> index a212c09aa138..6140b331017f 100644 >> --- a/common/filter >> +++ b/common/filter >> @@ -399,9 +399,53 @@ _filter_ending_dot() >> >> # Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices >> # It's gone in newer versions >> +# >> +# And util-linux v2.30 changed the output again, e.g. >> +# for a successful ro mount: >> +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only >> +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. >> +# >> +# a failed ro mount: >> +# prior to v2.30: >> +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only >> +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only >> +# v2.30 and later: >> +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. >> +# >> +# a failed rw remount: >> +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected >> +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. >> +# >> +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new >> +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: >> +# >> +# successful ro mount: >> +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only >> +# >> +# failed ro mount: >> +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only >> +# mount: cannot mount read-only >> +# >> +# failed rw remount: >> +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected >> _filter_ro_mount() { >> - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ >> - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" >> + perl -ne ' >> + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { >> + # successful ro mount >> + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; >> + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { >> + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount >> + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > > Leftover copy&paste line? > >> + print "mount: cannot mount read-only\n"; >> + } elsif (/(^mount: cannot mount) .* (read-only$)/) { >> + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount >> + print "$1 $2\n"; > > Maybe I am missing something, but why are you printing arguments > when you know what the expected output should be? > Also, in what is that match expression different from the v2.30 format? > Can't you merge both cases to use the more generic match expr > (without .*:) and print the expected result? > Also, I suggest to change the expected format to: "mount: cannot mount device read-only" (i.e. referring to "device") to be consistent with the rest of the _filter_ro_mount and _filter_busy_mount errors. Thanks, Amir. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 13:34 ` Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-23 14:09 ` Eryu Guan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-23 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:28:58PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on > > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only > > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message > > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), > > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. > > > > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating > > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new > > util-linux versions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > > --- > > v3: > > - document the filtered format in comments > > - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well > > - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output > > - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 > > > > common/filter | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > tests/generic/050 | 8 ++++---- > > tests/generic/050.out | 8 ++++---- > > tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- > > tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- > > 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter > > index a212c09aa138..6140b331017f 100644 > > --- a/common/filter > > +++ b/common/filter > > @@ -399,9 +399,53 @@ _filter_ending_dot() > > > > # Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices > > # It's gone in newer versions > > +# > > +# And util-linux v2.30 changed the output again, e.g. > > +# for a successful ro mount: > > +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. > > +# > > +# a failed ro mount: > > +# prior to v2.30: > > +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > > +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only > > +# v2.30 and later: > > +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. > > +# > > +# a failed rw remount: > > +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected > > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. > > +# > > +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new > > +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: > > +# > > +# successful ro mount: > > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > > +# > > +# failed ro mount: > > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > > +# mount: cannot mount read-only > > +# > > +# failed rw remount: > > +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected > > _filter_ro_mount() { > > - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ > > - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" > > + perl -ne ' > > + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { > > + # successful ro mount > > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > > + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { > > + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount > > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > > Leftover copy&paste line? No, that's intentional. Prior to v2.30, mount printed two-line error messages, as described in the comments above: # a failed ro mount: # prior to v2.30: # mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only # mount: cannot mount <device> read-only # v2.30 and later: # mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. So this is matching the one-line v2.30 format and converting it to two-line messages. > > > + print "mount: cannot mount read-only\n"; > > + } elsif (/(^mount: cannot mount) .* (read-only$)/) { > > + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount > > + print "$1 $2\n"; > > Maybe I am missing something, but why are you printing arguments > when you know what the expected output should be? No special reason, perhaps that was easier to type :) I'll print the expected output directly, and change the output to mount: cannot mount device read-only as you suggested. > Also, in what is that match expression different from the v2.30 format? v2.30 failed ro mount output is a single-line message, with the "<mountpoint> :" string in between "mount: " and "cannot mount", so I'm explicitly matching the colon with ".*:". prior to v2.30, failed ro mount output is two-line message, with the first line identical to the "successful ro mount" case (maybe I should have mentioned it too along with the "successful ro mount" comment), so I'm matching the second line here. > Can't you merge both cases to use the more generic match expr > (without .*:) and print the expected result? Seems no, I need to distinguish the two cases and decide if I should print out single-line or two-line messages. It's a bit complicated, maybe I missed some obvious straightforward fix, that's why I said the following in v1/v2 cover letter :) "Perhaps there're better and cleaner ways to fix the problems, please help review and advise" Thanks, Eryu > > > + } elsif (/mount:.* cannot remount .* read-write.*/) { > > + # failed rw remount > > + print "mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected\n"; > > + } else { > > + print "$_"; > > + }' | _filter_ending_dot > > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-24 5:01 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-24 8:04 ` Amir Goldstein 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-24 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fstests; +Cc: misono.tomohiro, linux-xfs, amir73il, Eryu Guan util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only block device, and in the failure case printed one line message instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new util-linux versions. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- v4 (also passed with both old & new util-linux): - add more comments to explain the output differences between util-linux versions - print out message directly instead of using perl variables - add word "device" to failed ro mount message v3: - document the filtered format in comments - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 common/filter | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- tests/generic/050 | 8 +++---- tests/generic/050.out | 8 +++---- tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter index a212c09aa138..9c33efacea6c 100644 --- a/common/filter +++ b/common/filter @@ -397,11 +397,62 @@ _filter_ending_dot() sed -e "s/\.$//" } -# Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices -# It's gone in newer versions +# Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices. It's +# gone in newer versions. v2.30 changed the output again. This filter is to +# unify all read-only mount messages across all util-linux versions. +# +# for a successful ro mount: +# ancient: mount: block device <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. +# +# a failed ro mount: +# ancient (two-line message): +# mount: block device <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# mount: cannot mount block device <device> read-only +# prior to v2.30 (two-line message): +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only +# v2.30 and later (single-line message): +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. +# +# a failed rw remount: +# ancient: mount: cannot remount block device <device> read-write, is write-protected +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. +# +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: +# +# successful ro mount: +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +# +# failed ro mount: +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +# mount: cannot mount device read-only +# +# failed rw remount: +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected _filter_ro_mount() { - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" + perl -ne ' + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { + # filter successful ro mount, and first line of prior to v2.30 + # format failed ro mount + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount, convert single-line + # message to two-line message + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; + print "mount: cannot mount device read-only\n"; + } elsif (/^mount: cannot mount .* read-only$/) { + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount + print "mount: cannot mount device read-only\n"; + } elsif (/mount:.* cannot remount .* read-write.*/) { + # filter failed rw remount + print "mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected\n"; + } else { + print "$_"; + }' | _filter_ending_dot } # Filter a failed mount output due to EUCLEAN and USTALE, util-linux changed diff --git a/tests/generic/050 b/tests/generic/050 index 5fa28a7648e5..efa45f04825b 100755 --- a/tests/generic/050 +++ b/tests/generic/050 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV # Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again # echo "mounting read-only block device:" -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)" touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV # -o norecovery is used. # echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:" -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" -_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ending_dot # # This is the way out if the underlying device really is read-only. @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch # data recovery hack. # echo "mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:" -_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount +_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch diff --git a/tests/generic/050.out b/tests/generic/050.out index fb90f6ea5819..7d70ddee83cb 100644 --- a/tests/generic/050.out +++ b/tests/generic/050.out @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ QA output created by 050 setting device read-only mounting read-only block device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail) touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system unmounting read-only filesystem @@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ going down: unmounting shutdown filesystem: setting device read-only mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only -mount: cannot mount SCRATCH_DEV read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: cannot mount device read-only unmounting read-only filesystem umount: SCRATCH_DEV: not mounted mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device: -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only unmounting read-only filesystem setting device read-write mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro: diff --git a/tests/overlay/035 b/tests/overlay/035 index 64fcd708105e..05447741a1ba 100755 --- a/tests/overlay/035 +++ b/tests/overlay/035 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ mkdir -p $lowerdir1 $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir $MOUNT_PROG -t overlay -o"lowerdir=$lowerdir2:$lowerdir1" \ $OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT # Make workdir immutable to prevent workdir re-create on mount @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ $CHATTR_PROG +i $workdir # Verify that overlay is mounted read-only and that it cannot be remounted rw. _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar 2>&1 | _filter_scratch -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount # success, all done status=0 diff --git a/tests/overlay/035.out b/tests/overlay/035.out index 5a5f67771402..e08ba2ebc691 100644 --- a/tests/overlay/035.out +++ b/tests/overlay/035.out @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 035 touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/bar': Read-only file system -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected -- 2.14.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-24 5:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-24 8:04 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-24 10:38 ` Karel Zak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-24 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs, Karel Zak [cc: Karel Zak] On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. > > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new > util-linux versions. > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > --- > v4 (also passed with both old & new util-linux): > - add more comments to explain the output differences between util-linux > versions > - print out message directly instead of using perl variables > - add word "device" to failed ro mount message Eryu, This looks good and you can take it as an ACK on the series. I've CC'ed Karel, so maybe he thinks about us fstests guys before making these sort of changes again... Thinking out loud, does xfstest even need to use mount program from util-linux? Do we ever need anything other than the bare libc mount(2)? We need it for -o loop, but that is the exception to the rule. For fs that have mount helpers (cifs,nfs), we could use mount.$FSTYP directly (what error formats are reported from the helpers??). For all other fs we can write a simple t_mount program to wrap libc mount(2) and not be dependent on util-linux error message formats. Maybe we can consider it next time util-linux changes.. Another idea to through in the air in the direction of Karel - Maybe it makes sense for util-linux to check some env variable and then print all error messages in a unified machine format, e.g.: fprintf("%s: errno=%d\n", progname, errno); Cheers, Amir. > > v3: > - document the filtered format in comments > - remove legacy sed filter, the perl filter covers the legacy case well > - filter out $SCRATCH_DEV/MNT too and use a consistent output > - remove the new filter_mount helper in overlay/035 > > common/filter | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > tests/generic/050 | 8 +++---- > tests/generic/050.out | 8 +++---- > tests/overlay/035 | 4 ++-- > tests/overlay/035.out | 4 ++-- > 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter > index a212c09aa138..9c33efacea6c 100644 > --- a/common/filter > +++ b/common/filter > @@ -397,11 +397,62 @@ _filter_ending_dot() > sed -e "s/\.$//" > } > > -# Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices > -# It's gone in newer versions > +# Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices. It's > +# gone in newer versions. v2.30 changed the output again. This filter is to > +# unify all read-only mount messages across all util-linux versions. > +# > +# for a successful ro mount: > +# ancient: mount: block device <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# prior to v2.30: mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. > +# > +# a failed ro mount: > +# ancient (two-line message): > +# mount: block device <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# mount: cannot mount block device <device> read-only > +# prior to v2.30 (two-line message): > +# mount: <device> is write-protected, mounting read-only > +# mount: cannot mount <device> read-only > +# v2.30 and later (single-line message): > +# mount: <mountpoint>: cannot mount <device> read-only. > +# > +# a failed rw remount: > +# ancient: mount: cannot remount block device <device> read-write, is write-protected > +# prior to v2.30: mount: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected > +# v2.30 and later: mount: <mountpoint>: cannot remount <device> read-write, is write-protected. > +# > +# Now use _filter_ro_mount to unify all these differences across old & new > +# util-linux versions. So the filtered format would be: > +# > +# successful ro mount: > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > +# > +# failed ro mount: > +# mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > +# mount: cannot mount device read-only > +# > +# failed rw remount: > +# mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected > _filter_ro_mount() { > - sed -e "s/mount: block device/mount:/g" \ > - -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g" > + perl -ne ' > + if (/write-protected, mount.*read-only/) { > + # filter successful ro mount, and first line of prior to v2.30 > + # format failed ro mount > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > + } elsif (/mount: .*: cannot mount.*read-only/) { > + # filter v2.30 format failed ro mount, convert single-line > + # message to two-line message > + print "mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only\n"; > + print "mount: cannot mount device read-only\n"; > + } elsif (/^mount: cannot mount .* read-only$/) { > + # filter prior to v2.30 format failed ro mount > + print "mount: cannot mount device read-only\n"; > + } elsif (/mount:.* cannot remount .* read-write.*/) { > + # filter failed rw remount > + print "mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected\n"; > + } else { > + print "$_"; > + }' | _filter_ending_dot > } > > # Filter a failed mount output due to EUCLEAN and USTALE, util-linux changed > diff --git a/tests/generic/050 b/tests/generic/050 > index 5fa28a7648e5..efa45f04825b 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/050 > +++ b/tests/generic/050 > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV > # Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again > # > echo "mounting read-only block device:" > -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount > +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount > > echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)" > touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV > # -o norecovery is used. > # > echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:" > -_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount > +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount > > echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" > -_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > +_scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ending_dot > > # > # This is the way out if the underlying device really is read-only. > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > # data recovery hack. > # > echo "mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:" > -_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount > +_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount > > echo "unmounting read-only filesystem" > _scratch_unmount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > diff --git a/tests/generic/050.out b/tests/generic/050.out > index fb90f6ea5819..7d70ddee83cb 100644 > --- a/tests/generic/050.out > +++ b/tests/generic/050.out > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > QA output created by 050 > setting device read-only > mounting read-only block device: > -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only > +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail) > touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system > unmounting read-only filesystem > @@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ going down: > unmounting shutdown filesystem: > setting device read-only > mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device: > -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only > -mount: cannot mount SCRATCH_DEV read-only > +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > +mount: cannot mount device read-only > unmounting read-only filesystem > umount: SCRATCH_DEV: not mounted > mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device: > -mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only > +mount: device write-protected, mounting read-only > unmounting read-only filesystem > setting device read-write > mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro: > diff --git a/tests/overlay/035 b/tests/overlay/035 > index 64fcd708105e..05447741a1ba 100755 > --- a/tests/overlay/035 > +++ b/tests/overlay/035 > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ mkdir -p $lowerdir1 $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir > $MOUNT_PROG -t overlay -o"lowerdir=$lowerdir2:$lowerdir1" \ > $OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT > touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount > $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT > > # Make workdir immutable to prevent workdir re-create on mount > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ $CHATTR_PROG +i $workdir > # Verify that overlay is mounted read-only and that it cannot be remounted rw. > _overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir2 $upperdir $workdir > touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > -_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_scratch > +_scratch_remount rw 2>&1 | _filter_ro_mount > > # success, all done > status=0 > diff --git a/tests/overlay/035.out b/tests/overlay/035.out > index 5a5f67771402..e08ba2ebc691 100644 > --- a/tests/overlay/035.out > +++ b/tests/overlay/035.out > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > QA output created by 035 > touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system > -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected > +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected > touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/bar': Read-only file system > -mount: cannot remount SCRATCH_DEV read-write, is write-protected > +mount: cannot remount device read-write, is write-protected > -- > 2.14.3 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-24 8:04 ` Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-24 10:38 ` Karel Zak 2017-11-26 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Karel Zak @ 2017-11-24 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: Eryu Guan, fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:04:33AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > [cc: Karel Zak] > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on > > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only > > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message > > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), > > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. > > > > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating > > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new > > util-linux versions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > > --- > > v4 (also passed with both old & new util-linux): > > - add more comments to explain the output differences between util-linux > > versions > > - print out message directly instead of using perl variables > > - add word "device" to failed ro mount message > > > Eryu, > > This looks good and you can take it as an ACK on the series. > > I've CC'ed Karel, so maybe he thinks about us fstests guys before making > these sort of changes again... Frankly, we have never promised that things like warning messages (or another messages) are stable interface. It's fragile to depend on this stuff... > Thinking out loud, does xfstest even need to use mount program from > util-linux? Do we ever need anything other than the bare libc mount(2)? > We need it for -o loop, but that is the exception to the rule. Well, I don't think that create a parallel universe is the best solution. > For fs that have mount helpers (cifs,nfs), we could use mount.$FSTYP > directly (what error formats are reported from the helpers??). For all other > fs we can write a simple t_mount program to wrap libc mount(2) and not be > dependent on util-linux error message formats. > Maybe we can consider it next time util-linux changes.. > > Another idea to through in the air in the direction of Karel - > Maybe it makes sense for util-linux to check some env variable > and then print all error messages in a unified machine format, e.g.: > fprintf("%s: errno=%d\n", progname, errno); This is good idea, I can try to implement it into libmount. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> http://karelzak.blogspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-24 10:38 ` Karel Zak @ 2017-11-26 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-27 10:54 ` Karel Zak 2017-11-28 7:52 ` Eryu Guan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-26 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karel Zak; +Cc: Eryu Guan, fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:04:33AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> [cc: Karel Zak] >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: >> > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on >> > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only >> > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message >> > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), >> > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. >> > >> > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating >> > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new >> > util-linux versions. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > v4 (also passed with both old & new util-linux): >> > - add more comments to explain the output differences between util-linux >> > versions >> > - print out message directly instead of using perl variables >> > - add word "device" to failed ro mount message >> >> >> Eryu, >> >> This looks good and you can take it as an ACK on the series. >> >> I've CC'ed Karel, so maybe he thinks about us fstests guys before making >> these sort of changes again... > > Frankly, we have never promised that things like warning messages (or > another messages) are stable interface. It's fragile to depend on this > stuff... > I know. No complains. Just wanted to inform you of the downstream ripples. >> Thinking out loud, does xfstest even need to use mount program from >> util-linux? Do we ever need anything other than the bare libc mount(2)? >> We need it for -o loop, but that is the exception to the rule. > > Well, I don't think that create a parallel universe is the best > solution. > I agree. However, xfstest uses 'mount' is a very particular way: - User has to provide both block device and mount point - xfstests already checks that those block device and mount point are not in use in /proc/mounts *before* calling 'mount' So I prefer the 'machine output format' solution going forward, but since xfstests will need to continue supporting old util-linux installations it might be less clumsy to use a simple C wrapper to mount(2), then to carry these error format filters. xfstests can also check for availability of the new machine format in 'mount' and if it doesn't exist fall back to using its private mount helper. >> For fs that have mount helpers (cifs,nfs), we could use mount.$FSTYP >> directly (what error formats are reported from the helpers??). For all other >> fs we can write a simple t_mount program to wrap libc mount(2) and not be >> dependent on util-linux error message formats. >> Maybe we can consider it next time util-linux changes.. >> >> Another idea to through in the air in the direction of Karel - >> Maybe it makes sense for util-linux to check some env variable >> and then print all error messages in a unified machine format, e.g.: >> fprintf("%s: errno=%d\n", progname, errno); > > This is good idea, I can try to implement it into libmount. > That would be great. Thanks, Amir. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-26 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein @ 2017-11-27 10:54 ` Karel Zak 2017-11-28 7:52 ` Eryu Guan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Karel Zak @ 2017-11-27 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: Eryu Guan, fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:56:40AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> Thinking out loud, does xfstest even need to use mount program from > >> util-linux? Do we ever need anything other than the bare libc mount(2)? > >> We need it for -o loop, but that is the exception to the rule. > > > > Well, I don't think that create a parallel universe is the best > > solution. > > > > I agree. However, xfstest uses 'mount' is a very particular way: > - User has to provide both block device and mount point > - xfstests already checks that those block device and mount point > are not in use in /proc/mounts *before* calling 'mount' OK, I see, than the wrapper is not so bad idea (if you're able to keep it simple and stupid:-) > So I prefer the 'machine output format' solution going forward, but > since xfstests will need to continue supporting old util-linux installations > it might be less clumsy to use a simple C wrapper to mount(2), then > to carry these error format filters. > xfstests can also check for availability of the new machine format in > 'mount' and if it doesn't exist fall back to using its private mount helper. If you want to implement the wrapper than it's probably better use it in all cases and then you can remove all the backward compatibility filters. In thins case it seems better to depend on the wrapper only. So, the unified messages maintained by unit-linux mount(8) will be unnecessary. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> http://karelzak.blogspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages 2017-11-26 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-27 10:54 ` Karel Zak @ 2017-11-28 7:52 ` Eryu Guan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2017-11-28 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: Karel Zak, fstests, Misono, Tomohiro, linux-xfs On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:56:40AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:04:33AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> [cc: Karel Zak] > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > util-linux commit 6dede2f2f7c5 ("libmount: support MS_RDONLY on > >> > write-protected devices") changed the error message on read-only > >> > block device, and in the failure case printed one line message > >> > instead of two (for details please see comments in common/filter), > >> > and this change broke generic/050 and overlay/035. > >> > > >> > Fix it by adding more filter rules to _filter_ro_mount and updating > >> > associated .out files to unify the output from both old and new > >> > util-linux versions. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > >> > --- > >> > v4 (also passed with both old & new util-linux): > >> > - add more comments to explain the output differences between util-linux > >> > versions > >> > - print out message directly instead of using perl variables > >> > - add word "device" to failed ro mount message > >> > >> > >> Eryu, > >> > >> This looks good and you can take it as an ACK on the series. > >> > >> I've CC'ed Karel, so maybe he thinks about us fstests guys before making > >> these sort of changes again... > > > > Frankly, we have never promised that things like warning messages (or > > another messages) are stable interface. It's fragile to depend on this > > stuff... > > > > I know. No complains. Just wanted to inform you of the downstream > ripples. Agreed. > > >> Thinking out loud, does xfstest even need to use mount program from > >> util-linux? Do we ever need anything other than the bare libc mount(2)? > >> We need it for -o loop, but that is the exception to the rule. > > > > Well, I don't think that create a parallel universe is the best > > solution. > > > > I agree. However, xfstest uses 'mount' is a very particular way: > - User has to provide both block device and mount point > - xfstests already checks that those block device and mount point > are not in use in /proc/mounts *before* calling 'mount' The problem is it's not a mount-only issue, outputs from other util-linux commands and commands from coreutils have been changing over time too, we really can't "fork" & maintain a local wrapper all the changing pieces. As long as fstests still go with the 'match golden image' path, it's not likely to avoid such problems completely. OTOH, the output changes are not so frequent (such a change per 3-4 years maybe?), I think the maintain burden of filters is much less than maintaining local wrappers of such commands. And commands like mount are fs-related, it's better to get them some (indirect) test coverage in fstests too, as we test other fs-specific userspace tools like xfsprogs, e2fsprogs etc. Thanks, Eryu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-28 7:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-11-23 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] fix failures caused by mount error msg change in util-linux v2.30 Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fstests: filter mount error message for EUCLEAN and ESTALE Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] overlay/036: filter busy mount message Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fstests: filter readonly mount error messages Eryu Guan 2017-11-23 13:28 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 13:34 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-23 14:09 ` Eryu Guan 2017-11-24 5:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Eryu Guan 2017-11-24 8:04 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-24 10:38 ` Karel Zak 2017-11-26 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein 2017-11-27 10:54 ` Karel Zak 2017-11-28 7:52 ` Eryu Guan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).