linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: handle register_shrinker error
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:34:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171125233453.GX5858@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201711242103.FIH57396.FOFVJtQFLSMOHO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 09:03:28PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Thanks. Updated patch below
> > ---
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling
> 
> Do we need below patch on top of Michal's patch?
> KM_NOFS was added by commit b17cb364dbbbf65a ("xfs: fix missing KM_NOFS
> tags to keep lockdep happy"). If not needed, some comment is expected.

Quite frankly, if the fix is "sprinkle magic undocumented
memalloc_nofs_save() calls around", then you need to think a little
more about the things you just read and the context we're operating
on here.

IOWs:

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 4c6e86d..b73fc76 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ struct xfs_buf *
>  	struct dax_device	*dax_dev)
>  {
>  	xfs_buftarg_t		*btp;
> +	unsigned int nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	btp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*btp), KM_SLEEP | KM_NOFS);

xfs_alloc_buftarg() isn't called from transaction context, so this
KM_NOFS flag wasn't added to prevent reclaim deadlocks - it was
added to avoid stupid lockdep false positives (as was stated in the
commit you quoted).

IOWs, GFP_KERNEL allocations in this function used to trigger
lockdep false positives.

So - think for a minute rather than bashing on the keyboard. Why
aren't the other GFP_KERNEL allocations from this function causing
lockdep to trigger warnings?

Yeah - lockdep is a lot smarter these days and the false positive
trigger has clearly been fixed. i.e. there's no false positive
detection occurring here any more under GFP_KERNEL allocations,
so we don't need the KM_NOFS flag anymore.

IOWs, we don't actually need to touch this code, but if you really
must, just remove the KM_NOFS tag.

-Dave.


-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-25 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23 12:08 [PATCH] xfs: handle register_shrinker error Michal Hocko
2017-11-23 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-23 13:41   ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-23 16:01     ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-23 16:11       ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-23 16:17         ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-23 16:31           ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-23 22:00         ` Dave Chinner
2017-11-24  7:39           ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2017-11-24 12:03             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-24 12:09               ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-25 23:34               ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-11-26  2:14                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-27  8:05                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 17:44             ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-28  9:35               ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 16:39                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-28 19:40                   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171125233453.GX5858@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).