From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:35656 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbdLEBej (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:34:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:34:22 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove "no-allocation" reservations for file creations Message-ID: <20171205013422.GC19219@magnolia> References: <20170821082404.3387-1-hch@lst.de> <20170823202213.GA4796@magnolia> <20170824004755.GC21024@dastard> <20170829180445.GU4757@magnolia> <20170903072513.GA14807@lst.de> <20170903153150.GE4073@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170903153150.GE4073@magnolia> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 09:25:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks like this didn't make the 4.14 for-next branch either. I guess > > we'll just consider it for the next round? > > Yes, it caused a number of new xfstests failures due to new ENOSPC > messages in the golden output so I decided to defer action on it until > someone can assess and fix the problems appropriately. The worst part > was that the new failures are intermittent. Heh, a customer slammed right into this, so I'll try to pick up this patch again and fix all the xfstests.... --D > --D > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html