From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] common/rc: report kmemleak errors
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:15:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214181508.GJ6896@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171214093718.GH2749@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:37:18PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:03:18PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > If kmemleak is enabled, scan and report memory leaks after every test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > check | 2 ++
> > common/rc | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/check b/check
> > index b2d251a..469188e 100755
> > --- a/check
> > +++ b/check
> > @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ _check_filesystems()
> > fi
> > }
> >
> > +_init_kmemleak
> > _prepare_test_list
> >
> > if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
> > @@ -793,6 +794,7 @@ for section in $HOST_OPTIONS_SECTIONS; do
> > n_try=`expr $n_try + 1`
> > _check_filesystems
> > _check_dmesg || err=true
> > + _check_kmemleak || err=true
> > fi
> >
> > fi
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index cb83918..a2bed36 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -3339,6 +3339,58 @@ _check_dmesg()
> > fi
> > }
> >
> > +# capture the kmemleak report
> > +_capture_kmemleak()
> > +{
> > + local _kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > + local _leak_file="$1"
> > +
> > + # Tell the kernel to scan for memory leaks. Apparently the write
> > + # returns before the scan is complete, so do it twice in the hopes
> > + # that twice is enough to capture all the leaks.
> > + echo "scan" > "${_kern_knob}"
> > + cat "${_kern_knob}" > /dev/null
> > + echo "scan" > "${_kern_knob}"
> > + cat "${_kern_knob}" > "${_leak_file}"
> > + echo "clear" > "${_kern_knob}"
>
> Hmm, two scans seem not enough either, I could see false positive easily
> in a 'quick' group run, because some leaks are not reported immediately
> after the test but after next test or next few tests. e.g. I saw
> generic/008 (tested on XFS) being reported as leaking memory, and from
> 008.kmemleak I saw:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff880277679800 (size 512):
> comm "nametest", pid 25007, jiffies 4300176958 (age 9.854s)
> ...
>
> But "nametest" is only used in generic/007, the leak should be triggered
> by generic/007 too, but 007 was reported as PASS in my case.
>
> Not sure what's the best way to deal with these false positive, adding
> more scans seem to work, but that's ugly and requires more test time..
> What do you think?
I'm not sure either -- the brief scan I made of mm/kmemleak.c didn't
reveal anything obvious that would explain the behavior we see. It
might just take a while for determine positively that an item isn't
gray.
We could change the message to state that found leaks might have
resulted from the previous test? That's rather unsatisfying, but I
don't know what else to do.
Or maybe a sleep 1 in between scans to see if that makes it more likely
to attribute a leak to the correct test? I don't anticipate running
xfstests with kmemleak=on too terribly often, so the extra ~700s won't
bother me too much.
--D
> Otherwise the whole check kmemleak framework looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +# set up kmemleak
> > +_init_kmemleak()
> > +{
> > + local _kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > +
> > + if [ ! -w "${_kern_knob}" ]; then
> > + return 0
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # Disable the automatic scan so that we can control it completely,
> > + # then dump all the leaks recorded so far.
> > + echo "scan=off" > "${_kern_knob}"
> > + _capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> > +}
> > +
> > +# check kmemleak log
> > +_check_kmemleak()
> > +{
> > + local _kern_knob="${DEBUGFS_MNT}/kmemleak"
> > + local _leak_file="${seqres}.kmemleak"
> > +
> > + if [ ! -w "${_kern_knob}" ]; then
> > + return 0
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # Capture and report any leaks
> > + _capture_kmemleak "${_leak_file}"
> > + if [ -s "${_leak_file}" ]; then
> > + _dump_err "_check_kmemleak: something found in kmemleak (see ${_leak_file})"
> > + return 1
> > + else
> > + rm -f "${_leak_file}"
> > + return 0
> > + fi
> > +}
> > +
> > # don't check dmesg log after test
> > _disable_dmesg_check()
> > {
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 6:03 [PATCH 0/8] weekly fstests changes Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] common/rc: report kmemleak errors Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-14 9:37 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-14 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-01-05 8:02 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-05 17:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-07 15:25 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] common/xfs: fix scrub support probing again Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] generic/45[34]: test line draw characters in file/attr names Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: fix tests to handle removal of no-alloc create nonfeature Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 22:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] generic: test error shutdown while stressing filesystem Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 6:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] fsstress: implement the clonerange/deduperange ioctls Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-14 6:39 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-12-14 7:32 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-14 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-03 8:48 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-03 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-05 4:35 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-05 4:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-06 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-09 7:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-02-22 16:06 ` Luis Henriques
2018-02-22 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-02-22 18:17 ` Luis Henriques
2018-02-22 18:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-02-23 10:17 ` Luis Henriques
2017-12-13 6:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] generic: run a long-soak write-only fsstress test Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-07 15:34 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-13 6:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs/068: fix variability problems in file/dir count output Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 22:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:42 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:28 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] xfs/068: fix clonerange " Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:44 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-14 6:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-12-14 7:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-12-14 7:49 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-14 8:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-12-14 21:35 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-15 2:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 4:37 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-15 7:06 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-12-15 2:08 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] xfs/068: fix variability " Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 2:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 2:17 ` [PATCH v4 " Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 8:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] weekly fstests changes Eryu Guan
2018-01-03 19:22 ` [PATCH 9/8] xfs: find libxfs api violations Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-03 19:26 ` [PATCH 10/8] xfs: check that fs freeze minimizes required recovery Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-09 11:33 ` Eryu Guan
2018-01-10 0:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214181508.GJ6896@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).