From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] xfs: move inode fork verifiers to xfs_dinode_verify
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:16:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219051619.GP4094@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151320952955.30654.5858027812526222455.stgit@magnolia>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:58:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Consolidate the fork size and format verifiers to xfs_dinode_verify so
> that we can reject bad inodes earlier and in a single place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c | 86 ----------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index 0e4c720..1392fe9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
> uint16_t mode;
> uint16_t flags;
> uint64_t flags2;
> + uint64_t di_size;
>
> if (dip->di_magic != cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC))
> return __this_address;
> @@ -408,7 +409,8 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
> }
>
> /* don't allow invalid i_size */
> - if (be64_to_cpu(dip->di_size) & (1ULL << 63))
> + di_size = be64_to_cpu(dip->di_size);
> + if (di_size & (1ULL << 63))
> return __this_address;
>
> mode = be16_to_cpu(dip->di_mode);
> @@ -416,14 +418,74 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
> return __this_address;
>
> /* No zero-length symlinks/dirs. */
> - if ((S_ISLNK(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode)) && dip->di_size == 0)
> + if ((S_ISLNK(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode)) && di_size == 0)
> return __this_address;
>
> + /* Fork checks carried over from xfs_iformat_fork */
> + if (mode &&
> + be32_to_cpu(dip->di_nextents) + be16_to_cpu(dip->di_anextents) >
> + be64_to_cpu(dip->di_nblocks))
Can you indent this last line so it doesn't look like a spearate
logic check?
if (mode &&
be32_to_cpu(dip->di_nextents) + be16_to_cpu(dip->di_anextents) >
be64_to_cpu(dip->di_nblocks))
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + if (mode && dip->di_forkoff > mp->m_sb.sb_inodesize)
> + return __this_address;
Hold on, this check is completely bogus. di_forkoff is in units of 8 bytes,
which inode size is in bytes. Also, di_forkoff is a u8, so it can't
/ever/ be larger than the inode size which are >= 256 bytes. Yeah,
though so:
#define XFS_DFORK_BOFF(dip) ((int)((dip)->di_forkoff << 3))
This check needs to be:
if (mode && XFS_DFORK_BOFF(dip) > mp->m_sb.sb_inodesize)
return __this_address;
Otherwise looks good.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 23:58 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: more and better verifiers Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: refactor long-format btree header verification routines Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-14 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-15 0:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: remove XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN from dir3 data verifiers Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 3:50 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: have buffer verifier functions report failing address Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 4:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 20:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: refactor verifier callers to print address of failing check Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-14 22:03 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-15 0:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-15 3:09 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 20:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: verify dinode header first Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: move inode fork verifiers to xfs_dinode_verify Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 5:16 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-12-19 20:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 20:48 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:58 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: create structure verifier function for shortform xattrs Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 5:23 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 21:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: create structure verifier function for short form symlinks Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 5:27 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 20:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: refactor short form directory structure verifier function Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 5:45 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: provide a centralized method for verifying inline fork data Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 6:06 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: fail out of xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int if it looks corrupt Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 6:13 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: create a new buf_ops pointer to verify structure metadata Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 6:22 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-19 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 20:53 ` Dave Chinner
2017-12-13 23:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: scrub in-core metadata Darrick J. Wong
2017-12-19 6:23 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171219051619.GP4094@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox