From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:47846 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755686AbdLTW3h (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:29:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 09:29:33 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Rationale for hardware RAID 10 su, sw values in FAQ Message-ID: <20171220222933.GH4094@dastard> References: <20170927004302.GB3666@dastard> <20170927043308.GC3666@dastard> <0dbebe1a-4704-0880-87cc-f029921b6c7f@mcneill.gen.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0dbebe1a-4704-0880-87cc-f029921b6c7f@mcneill.gen.nz> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Ewen McNeill Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 03:19:32PM +1300, Ewen McNeill wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 28/09/17 12:36, Ewen McNeill wrote: > >Perhaps the perfect is the enemy of the good here.  Would it help > >if I were to write up some text covering: > >[... storage media/RAID considerations for xfs layout ...] > > > >(No promises when, but "October" seems plausible if this would be useful.) > > So... October proved not to be plausible. But I'm still considering > writing something, perhaps while it's quieter over late > December/early January. > > AFAICT the relevant "TODO" section of: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-documentation.git/tree/admin/XFS_Performance_Tuning/filesystem_tunables.asciidoc > > is unchanged. > > If it's still useful to write something, I'll see if there's a quiet > "home" day over the holidays to write a page or so about the > considerations I'm aware of as a SysAdmin. Sure, if you've got time to write something it would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com