Re: [V4, 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>]

On 05/01/2018 at 14:48:04 -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 01/05/18 05:05, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm definitively late to the party but...
> > 
> > On 17/11/2017 at 11:00:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> +2. Style:
> >> +
> >> +   The SPDX license identifier is added in form of a comment.  The comment
> >> +   style depends on the file type::
> >> +
> >> +      C source:   // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> >> +      C header:   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
> >> +      ASM:        /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
> >> +      scripts:    # SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> >> +      .rst:	  .. SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> >> +      .dts{i}:	  // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
> > 
> > dtc doesn't handle // comments. This works in the kernel tree because
> 
> dtc does handle // comments.
> 

Hum, correct. I got a report saying it didn't and when I only checked
the COMMENT line of dtc-lexer.l. For whatever reason, I missed the
following line handling c++ comments.

I'll get back to the original report, trying to find why it was not
compiling.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com