From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xfs: harden directory integrity checks some more
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 10:47:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109184729.GF5602@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109071336.GD5602@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
If a malicious filesystem image contains a block+ format directory
wherein the directory inode's core.mode is set such that
S_ISDIR(core.mode) == 0, and if there are subdirectories of the
corrupted directory, an attempt to traverse up the directory tree will
crash the kernel in __xfs_dir3_data_check. Running the online scrub's
parent checks will tend to do this.
The crash occurs because the directory inode's d_ops get set to
xfs_dir[23]_nondir_ops (it's not a directory) but the parent pointer
scrubber's indiscriminate call to xfs_readdir proceeds past the ASSERT
if we have non fatal asserts configured.
Fix the null pointer dereference crash in __xfs_dir3_data_check by
looking for S_ISDIR or wrong d_ops; and teach the parent scrubber
to bail out if it is fed a non-directory "parent".
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
v2: check for wrong d_ops, not individual function pointers
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c | 8 ++++++++
fs/xfs/scrub/parent.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c
index 3237812..853d9ab 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ __xfs_dir3_data_check(
*/
ops = xfs_dir_get_ops(mp, dp);
+ /*
+ * If this isn't a directory, or we don't get handed the dir ops,
+ * something is seriously wrong. Bail out.
+ */
+ if ((dp && !S_ISDIR(VFS_I(dp)->i_mode)) ||
+ ops != xfs_dir_get_ops(mp, NULL))
+ return __this_address;
+
hdr = bp->b_addr;
p = (char *)ops->data_entry_p(hdr);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/parent.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/parent.c
index dd704fd..0d38514 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/parent.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/parent.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ xfs_scrub_parent_validate(
error = xfs_iget(mp, sc->tp, dnum, 0, 0, &dp);
if (!xfs_scrub_fblock_xref_process_error(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, 0, &error))
goto out;
- if (dp == sc->ip) {
+ if (dp == sc->ip || !S_ISDIR(VFS_I(dp)->i_mode)) {
xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, 0);
goto out_rele;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 7:13 [PATCH] xfs: harden directory integrity checks some more Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-09 16:09 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-09 18:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-09 18:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-01-09 18:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180109184729.GF5602@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox