public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] xfs: check sb_agblocks and sb_agblklog when validating superblock
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:31:02 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115213102.GZ16421@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115200313.GC5602@magnolia>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:03:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Currently, we don't check sb_agblocks or sb_agblklog when we validate
> the superblock, which means that we can fuzz garbage values into those
> values and the mount succeeds.  This leads to all sorts of UBSAN
> warnings in xfs/350 since we can then coerce other parts of xfs into
> shifting by ridiculously large values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: simplify ag min/max size definitions
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h |    7 +++++++
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> index fc4386a..3ab1870 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -233,6 +233,13 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
>  #define XFS_MAX_LOG_BLOCKS	(1024 * 1024ULL)
>  #define XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES	(10 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
>  
> +/*
> + * Limits on sb_agblocks/sb_agblklog -- mkfs won't format AGs smaller than
> + * 16MB or larger than 1TB.
> + */
> +#define XFS_AG_MIN_BYTES	(1ULL << 24)	/* 16 MB */
> +#define XFS_AG_MAX_BYTES	(1ULL << 40)	/* 1 TB */

Sure, but....
> +
>  /* keep the maximum size under 2^31 by a small amount */
>  #define XFS_MAX_LOG_BYTES \
>  	((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) - XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 08e44a0..bdb4f74 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
>  	    sbp->sb_inodesize != (1 << sbp->sb_inodelog)		||
>  	    sbp->sb_logsunit > XLOG_MAX_RECORD_BSIZE			||
>  	    sbp->sb_inopblock != howmany(sbp->sb_blocksize,sbp->sb_inodesize) ||
> +	    XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_agblocks) < XFS_AG_MIN_BYTES	||
> +	    XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_agblocks) > XFS_AG_MAX_BYTES	||

.... this really needs to be checked against sb_dblocks /
sb_agcount. i.e. check against current filesystem size and geometry,
not against the theoretical maximum.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-15 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-12 22:03 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: kasan/ubsan fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: check sb_agblocks and sb_agblklog when validating superblock Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41   ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:49     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:03   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 21:31     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-01-16  7:00       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 12:48     ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 17:34       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 18:02         ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 21:10           ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-17  1:20   ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-17 12:55     ` Brian Foster
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: don't iunlock unlocked inodes Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41   ` Brian Foster
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: directory scrubber must walk through data block to offset Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41   ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:04   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 21:56     ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-16  7:01       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 23:30   ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-17  0:29     ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: attr leaf verifier needs to check for obviously bad count Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:42   ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:05   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 12:50     ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 23:32       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: btree format ifork loader should check for zero numrecs Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:42   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180115213102.GZ16421@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox