From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: check sb_agblocks and sb_agblklog when validating superblock
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:20:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117012022.GC25805@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151579464601.8694.5478076755339350941.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Currently, we don't check sb_agblocks or sb_agblklog when we validate
the superblock, which means that we can fuzz garbage values into those
values and the mount succeeds. This leads to all sorts of UBSAN
warnings in xfs/350 since we can then coerce other parts of xfs into
shifting by ridiculously large values.
Once we've validated agblocks, make sure the agcount makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
v3: also check that dblocks/agcount/agblocks make sense
v2: simplify ag min/max size definitions
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 7 +++++++
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
index fc4386a..1de8555 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
@@ -233,6 +233,13 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
#define XFS_MAX_LOG_BLOCKS (1024 * 1024ULL)
#define XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES (10 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
+/*
+ * Limits on sb_agblocks/sb_agblklog -- mkfs won't format AGs smaller than
+ * 16MB or larger than 1TB.
+ */
+#define XFS_MIN_AG_BYTES (1ULL << 24) /* 16 MB */
+#define XFS_MAX_AG_BYTES (1ULL << 40) /* 1 TB */
+
/* keep the maximum size under 2^31 by a small amount */
#define XFS_MAX_LOG_BYTES \
((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) - XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index 08e44a0..e2b82d7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
bool check_inprogress,
bool check_version)
{
+ u32 agcount = 0;
+ u32 rem;
+
if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
xfs_warn(mp, "bad magic number");
return -EWRONGFS;
@@ -229,6 +232,13 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* Compute agcount for this number of dblocks and agblocks */
+ if (sbp->sb_agblocks) {
+ agcount = div_u64_rem(sbp->sb_dblocks, sbp->sb_agblocks, &rem);
+ if (rem)
+ agcount++;
+ }
+
/*
* More sanity checking. Most of these were stolen directly from
* xfs_repair.
@@ -253,6 +263,10 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
sbp->sb_inodesize != (1 << sbp->sb_inodelog) ||
sbp->sb_logsunit > XLOG_MAX_RECORD_BSIZE ||
sbp->sb_inopblock != howmany(sbp->sb_blocksize,sbp->sb_inodesize) ||
+ XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_agblocks) < XFS_MIN_AG_BYTES ||
+ XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, sbp->sb_agblocks) > XFS_MAX_AG_BYTES ||
+ sbp->sb_agblklog != xfs_highbit32(sbp->sb_agblocks - 1) + 1 ||
+ agcount == 0 || agcount != sbp->sb_agcount ||
(sbp->sb_blocklog - sbp->sb_inodelog != sbp->sb_inopblog) ||
(sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE) ||
(sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE) ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-12 22:03 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: kasan/ubsan fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: check sb_agblocks and sb_agblklog when validating superblock Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 21:31 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-16 7:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 12:48 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 18:02 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 21:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-17 1:20 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-01-17 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 " Brian Foster
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: don't iunlock unlocked inodes Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: directory scrubber must walk through data block to offset Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:41 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:04 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-16 7:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-17 0:29 ` Dave Chinner
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: attr leaf verifier needs to check for obviously bad count Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:42 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-15 19:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-16 12:50 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 23:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: btree format ifork loader should check for zero numrecs Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-15 14:42 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117012022.GC25805@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox