From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] xfs: reflink fixes
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:25:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180122232504.GO25805@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151651282961.28390.17944517354130397779.stgit@magnolia>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 09:33:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Running generic/232 with quotas and reflink demonstrated that there was
> something wrong with the way we did quota accounting -- on an otherwise
> idle system, fs-wide du block count numbers didn't match the quota
> reports. I started digging into why the quota accounting was wrong, and
> the following are the results of my bug hunt.
Well, I wasn't expecting 4.15 to be delayed again, but I guess it has.
To disambiguate: this series is intended for 4.16, even though I already
sent out the AGFL series tagged for 4.17.
--D
> The first patch teaches the reflink code to break layout leases before
> commencing the block remapping work. This time we avoid the "looping
> trying to get a lock" that Christoph complained about, in favor of
> dropping both locks and retrying if we can't cleanly break the layouts
> without waiting.
>
> The second patch changes the source file locking (if src != dest) during
> a reflink operation to take the shared locks when possible. The only
> thing changing in the source file is the setting of the reflink iflag,
> for which we will still take ILOCK_EXCL. The net result of this is
> less lock contention during fsstress and a 30% lower runtime, not that
> anyone cares about fsstress benchmarking. :)
>
> Patch three ensure that we attach dquots to inodes before we start
> reflinking their blocks. This could lead to quota undercharging; an
> fstest to check this will be sent separately.
>
> Patch four reorganizes the copy on write quota updating code to reflect
> how the CoW fork works now. In short, the CoW fork is entirely in
> memory, so we can only use the in-memory quota reservation counters for
> all CoW blocks; the accounting only becomes permanent if we remap an
> extent into the data fork.
>
> Patch five creates a separate i_cow_blocks counter to track all the CoW
> blocks assigned to a file, which makes changing a file's uid/gid/prjid
> easier, makes reporting cow blocks via stat easy, and enables various
> cleanups.
>
> Patch six fixes a serious potential corruption problem with the cow
> extent allocation -- when we allocate into the CoW fork with the cow
> extent size hint set, the allocator enlarges the allocation request to
> try to hit alignment goals. However, if the allocated extent does not
> actually fulfill any of the requested range, we send a garbage
> zero-length extent back to the iomap code (which also doesn't notice),
> and the write lands at the startblock of the garbage extent. The fix is
> to detect that we didn't fill the entire requested range and fix up the
> returned mapping so that we always fill the first block of the
> requested allocation.
>
> --D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-22 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-21 5:33 [PATCH 0/6] xfs: reflink fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: reflink should break pnfs leases before sharing blocks Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-23 12:05 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-23 18:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: only grab shared inode locks for source file during reflink Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-23 12:05 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-23 18:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: call xfs_qm_dqattach before performing reflink operations Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-23 12:05 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-23 18:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: CoW fork operations should only update quota reservations Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: track CoW blocks separately in the inode Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fix up cowextsz allocation shortfalls Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-22 23:25 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-11 2:16 [PATCH 0/6] xfs: reflink fixes Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180122232504.GO25805@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox