From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: handle inconsistent log item formatting state correctly
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 08:52:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302215257.GR30854@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302171833.GS19312@magnolia>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:18:33AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:35:27AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > Brian Foster reported an oops like:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
> > IP: xlog_cil_push+0x184/0x400 [xfs]
> > ....
> > Workqueue: xfs-cil/dm-3 xlog_cil_push_work [xfs]
> > RIP: 0010:xlog_cil_push+0x184/0x400 [xfs]
> > ....
> >
> > This was caused by the log item size calculation return that there
> > were no log vectors to write on a normal buffer. This should only
> > occur for ordered buffers - the exception handling had never been
> > executed for a non-ordered buffer. This mean we ended up with
> > a log item marked dirty (XFS_LID_DIRTY) but with no log vectors
> > attached that got added to the CIL. When the CIL was pushed, it
> > tripped over the null log vector on the dirty log item when trying
> > to chain the log vectors that needed to be written to the log.
> >
> > Fix this by clearing the XFS_LID_DIRTY flag on the log item if
> > nothing gets formatted. This will prevent the log item from being
> > added incorrectly to the CIL, and hence avoid the crash
>
> Is there a test case for this, or just intermittent crashes?
Nope, we can't hit this case right now - it's something that was
only triggered by a bug in my ranged buffer logging patch. It's
clearly a bug, though, so it's a landmine we should remove.
> > Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > index 61ab5c0a4c45..c1ecd7698100 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > @@ -345,9 +345,16 @@ xlog_cil_insert_format_items(
> > if (shadow->lv_buf_len == XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> > ordered = true;
> >
> > - /* Skip items that do not have any vectors for writing */
> > - if (!shadow->lv_niovecs && !ordered)
> > + /*
> > + * Skip items that do not have any vectors for writing. These
> > + * log items must now be considered clean in this transaction,
> > + * so clear the XFS_LID_DIRTY flag to ensure it doesn't get
> > + * added to the CIL by mistake.
> > + */
> > + if (!shadow->lv_niovecs && !ordered) {
> > + lidp->lid_flags &= ~XFS_LID_DIRTY;
> > continue;
> > + }
> >
> > /* compare to existing item size */
> > old_lv = lip->li_lv;
> > @@ -486,6 +493,14 @@ xlog_cil_insert_items(
> > if (!(lidp->lid_flags & XFS_LID_DIRTY))
> > continue;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Log items added to the CIL must have a formatted log vector
> > + * attached to them. This is a requirement of the log vector
> > + * chaining used separate the log items from the changes that
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> /me trips over this part of the comment, is this supposed to say
> '...chaining using separate log items...' or '...used to separate the log
> items...'?
The latter.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 22:35 [PATCH] xfs: handle inconsistent log item formatting state correctly Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-02 21:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-03-05 14:40 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-05 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-06 12:31 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-06 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-07 1:16 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-07 2:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-07 14:05 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-08 4:40 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-08 19:11 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-08 22:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-09 15:47 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-24 17:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-26 11:36 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180302215257.GR30854@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).