linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: handle inconsistent log item formatting state correctly
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 08:52:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302215257.GR30854@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302171833.GS19312@magnolia>

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:18:33AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:35:27AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Brian Foster reported an oops like:
> > 
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
> > IP: xlog_cil_push+0x184/0x400 [xfs]
> > ....
> > Workqueue: xfs-cil/dm-3 xlog_cil_push_work [xfs]
> > RIP: 0010:xlog_cil_push+0x184/0x400 [xfs]
> > ....
> > 
> > This was caused by the log item size calculation return that there
> > were no log vectors to write on a normal buffer. This should only
> > occur for ordered buffers - the exception handling had never been
> > executed for a non-ordered buffer. This mean we ended up with
> > a log item marked dirty (XFS_LID_DIRTY) but with no log vectors
> > attached that got added to the CIL. When the CIL was pushed, it
> > tripped over the null log vector on the dirty log item when trying
> > to chain the log vectors that needed to be written to the log.
> > 
> > Fix this by clearing the XFS_LID_DIRTY flag on the log item if
> > nothing gets formatted. This will prevent the log item from being
> > added incorrectly to the CIL, and hence avoid the crash
> 
> Is there a test case for this, or just intermittent crashes?

Nope, we can't hit this case right now - it's something that was
only triggered by a bug in my ranged buffer logging patch. It's
clearly a bug, though, so it's a landmine we should remove.

> > Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > index 61ab5c0a4c45..c1ecd7698100 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> > @@ -345,9 +345,16 @@ xlog_cil_insert_format_items(
> >  		if (shadow->lv_buf_len == XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> >  			ordered = true;
> >  
> > -		/* Skip items that do not have any vectors for writing */
> > -		if (!shadow->lv_niovecs && !ordered)
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Skip items that do not have any vectors for writing. These
> > +		 * log items must now be considered clean in this transaction,
> > +		 * so clear the XFS_LID_DIRTY flag to ensure it doesn't get
> > +		 * added to the CIL by mistake.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!shadow->lv_niovecs && !ordered) {
> > +			lidp->lid_flags &= ~XFS_LID_DIRTY;
> >  			continue;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		/* compare to existing item size */
> >  		old_lv = lip->li_lv;
> > @@ -486,6 +493,14 @@ xlog_cil_insert_items(
> >  		if (!(lidp->lid_flags & XFS_LID_DIRTY))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Log items added to the CIL must have a formatted log vector
> > +		 * attached to them. This is a requirement of the log vector
> > +		 * chaining used separate the log items from the changes that
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> /me trips over this part of the comment, is this supposed to say
> '...chaining using separate log items...' or '...used to separate the log
> items...'?

The latter.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-02 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-01 22:35 [PATCH] xfs: handle inconsistent log item formatting state correctly Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-02 21:52   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-03-05 14:40 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-05 22:18   ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-06 12:31     ` Brian Foster
2018-03-06 22:14       ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-07  1:16         ` Brian Foster
2018-03-07  2:12           ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-07 14:05             ` Brian Foster
2018-03-08  4:40             ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-08 19:11               ` Brian Foster
2018-03-08 22:10                 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-09 15:47                   ` Brian Foster
2018-03-24 17:05                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-26 11:36                       ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180302215257.GR30854@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).