From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] iomap: Use FUA for pure data O_DSYNC DIO writes
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:00:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302230042.GA31370@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302225319.GW30854@dastard>
Oh, and another thing: I think you want to make this new code dependent
on the block devie actually supporting REQ_FUA natively. Otherwise
you'll cause a flush for every emulated FUA write, which is only going
make things worse, especially for ATA where FLUSH is not queued. And
last time I check libata still disabled FUA by default.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:53:19AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > @@ -760,8 +761,19 @@ static ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> > > }
> > >
> > > inode_dio_end(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp));
> > > - kfree(dio);
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * If a FUA write was done, then that is all we required for datasync
> > > + * semantics -. we don't need to call generic_write_sync() to complete
> > > + * the write.
> > > + */
> > > + if (ret > 0 &&
> > > + (dio->flags & (IOMAP_DIO_WRITE|IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA)) ==
> > > + IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> > > + ret = generic_write_sync(iocb, ret);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kfree(dio);
> >
> > Can please split the move of the generic_write_sync call into
> > generic_write_sync a separate prep patch? It's enough of a logic change
> > on its own that it warrants a separate commit with a separate explanation.
>
> Ok, that makes sense.
>
> > Also I'd be tempted to invert the IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA flag and replace
> > it with an IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_SYNC flag to indicate we need the
> > generic_write_sync call, as that should make the logic much more clear.
>
> Ah, much cleaner.
>
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index 260ff5e5c264..81aa3b73471e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -732,6 +732,11 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
> > > ret = xfs_file_dio_aio_write(iocb, from);
> > > if (ret == -EREMCHG)
> > > goto buffered;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Direct IO handles sync type writes internally on I/O
> > > + * completion.
> > > + */
> > > + return ret;
> > > } else {
> > > buffered:
> > > ret = xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(iocb, from);
> >
> > The else is not needed and you can now have a much more sensible
> > code flow here:
> >
> > ret = xfs_file_dio_aio_write(iocb, from);
> > if (ret != -EREMCHG))
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > ret = xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(iocb, from);
>
> I thought about that, but as you noticed the DAX case gets in the
> way so I didn't bother for a RFC patch.
>
> I'll have a look at making the DAX iomap code do something similar
> with generic_write_sync() so we can simplify this high level code.
>
> Thanks Christoph!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 1:41 [PATCH] [RFC] iomap: Use FUA for pure data O_DSYNC DIO writes Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 17:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-02 22:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 22:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-04 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 22:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 23:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-03-02 23:15 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 23:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-12 23:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-03-13 0:15 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-13 5:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-13 16:00 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-13 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-13 18:52 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-19 16:06 ` Jan Kara
2018-03-19 16:14 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-21 23:52 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-22 14:35 ` Jan Kara
2018-03-22 14:38 ` Robert Dorr
2018-04-24 14:09 ` Robert Dorr
2018-04-24 15:32 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-25 22:28 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180302230042.GA31370@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).