linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] iomap: Use FUA for pure data O_DSYNC DIO writes
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:00:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302230042.GA31370@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302225319.GW30854@dastard>

Oh, and another thing:  I think you want to make this new code dependent
on the block devie actually supporting REQ_FUA natively.  Otherwise
you'll cause a flush for every emulated FUA write, which is only going
make things worse, especially for ATA where FLUSH is not queued.  And
last time I check libata still disabled FUA by default.

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:53:19AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > @@ -760,8 +761,19 @@ static ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	inode_dio_end(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp));
> > > -	kfree(dio);
> > >  
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If a FUA write was done, then that is all we required for datasync
> > > +	 * semantics -. we don't need to call generic_write_sync() to complete
> > > +	 * the write.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (ret > 0 &&
> > > +	    (dio->flags & (IOMAP_DIO_WRITE|IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA)) ==
> > > +							IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> > > +		ret = generic_write_sync(iocb, ret);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	kfree(dio);
> > 
> > Can please split the move of the generic_write_sync call into
> > generic_write_sync a separate prep patch?  It's enough of a logic change
> > on its own that it warrants a separate commit with a separate explanation.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense.
> 
> > Also I'd be tempted to invert the IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA flag and replace
> > it with an IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_SYNC flag to indicate we need the
> > generic_write_sync call, as that should make the logic much more clear.
> 
> Ah, much cleaner.
> 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index 260ff5e5c264..81aa3b73471e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -732,6 +732,11 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
> > >  		ret = xfs_file_dio_aio_write(iocb, from);
> > >  		if (ret == -EREMCHG)
> > >  			goto buffered;
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Direct IO handles sync type writes internally on I/O
> > > +		 * completion.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		return ret;
> > >  	} else {
> > >  buffered:
> > >  		ret = xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(iocb, from);
> > 
> > The else is not needed and you can now have a much more sensible
> > code flow here:
> > 
> > 		ret = xfs_file_dio_aio_write(iocb, from);
> > 		if (ret != -EREMCHG))
> > 			return ret;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	ret = xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(iocb, from);
> 
> I thought about that, but as you noticed the DAX case gets in the
> way so I didn't bother for a RFC patch.
> 
> I'll have a look at making the DAX iomap code do something similar
> with generic_write_sync() so we can simplify this high level code.
> 
> Thanks Christoph!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
---end quoted text---

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-02 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-01  1:41 [PATCH] [RFC] iomap: Use FUA for pure data O_DSYNC DIO writes Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 17:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-02 22:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 22:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-04 23:00     ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 15:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 22:53   ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 22:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-02 23:00     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-03-02 23:15       ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-02 23:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-12 23:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-03-13  0:15   ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-13  5:10     ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-13 16:00       ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-13 16:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-13 18:52           ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-19 16:06             ` Jan Kara
2018-03-19 16:14               ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-21 23:52                 ` Robert Dorr
2018-03-22 14:35                 ` Jan Kara
2018-03-22 14:38                   ` Robert Dorr
2018-04-24 14:09                     ` Robert Dorr
2018-04-24 15:32                       ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-25 22:28                       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180302230042.GA31370@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).