linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix transaction allocation deadlock in IO path
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:32:48 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305213248.GC18129@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180305174455.GB14201@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:44:55PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:11:20PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > xfs_trans_alloc() does GFP_KERNEL allocation, and we can call it
> > while holding pages locked for writeback in the ->writepages path.
> > The memory allocation is allowed to wait on pages under writeback,
> > and so can wait on pages that are held locked in writeback by the
> > caller.
> > 
> > This affects both pre-IO submission and post-IO submission paths.
> > Hence xfs_setsize_trans_alloc(), xfs_reflink_end_cow(),
> > xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() and xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range().
> > xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() already does the right thing, but the
> > others don't. Fix them.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> I believe these are two separate regressions though, introduced on separate
> kernels Can we treat them as such and use respective Fixes tag for them?

Neither are regressions - they are effectively zero-day bugs. In
general, I don't use Fixes tags for things that are not regressions
and are easily discoverable from the published git history...

> 
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c    | 3 ++-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > index 9c6a830da0ee..a0afb6411417 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > @@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc(
> >  	struct xfs_trans	*tp;
> >  	int			error;
> >  
> > -	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_fsyncts, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
> > +	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_fsyncts, 0, 0,
> > +				XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> >  	if (error)
> >  		return error;
> >  
> 
> Fixes: 253f4911f297b ("xfs: better xfs_trans_alloc interface")

No, thats wrong - that commit didn't change any behaviour. The
original commit:

281627df3eb5 ("xfs: log file size updates at I/O completion time")

called:

	tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_FSYNC_TS);


which resulted in a GFP_KERNEL allocation via:

	tp = _xfs_trans_alloc(mp, type, KM_SLEEP);

So this is a zero-day bug in logging file size updates at IO
completion.

> Introduced on v4.7
> 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > index 270246943a06..8c16177b33d4 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(
> >  
> >  	/* Start a rolling transaction to remove the mappings */
> >  	error = xfs_trans_alloc(ip->i_mount, &M_RES(ip->i_mount)->tr_write,
> > -			0, 0, 0, &tp);
> > +			0, 0, XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> >  	if (error)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow(
> >  			(unsigned int)(end_fsb - offset_fsb),
> >  			XFS_DATA_FORK);
> >  	error = xfs_trans_alloc(ip->i_mount, &M_RES(ip->i_mount)->tr_write,
> > -			resblks, 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> > +			resblks, 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE | XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> >  	if (error)
> >  		goto out;
> 
> For both of the above:
> 
> Fixes: 43caeb187deb9 ("xfs: move mappings from cow fork to data fork after copy-write)"

And that's a zero-day, too. So neither are regressions.

-Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-05 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05  4:11 [PATCH] xfs: fix transaction allocation deadlock in IO path Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 14:40 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-05 21:38   ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 17:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-03-05 21:32   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-03-06 16:53   ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-07 15:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-08  8:08 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180305213248.GC18129@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).