From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] xfs_scrub: don't ask user to run xfs_repair for only warnings
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 15:24:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306232424.GQ18989@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fa61794-39c8-564b-ae68-523eb22ff6f1@sandeen.net>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:00:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/6/18 12:53 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:34:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> My other quibble is that if (scrub ioctl ran && errors remain) is true only
> >> because "-n" was specified, it seems a little odd to instruct the user
> >> to run repair, when the errors may remain only because of -n. But that's
> >> a separate issue, I guess.
> >
> > My thought process here is that any time we leave errors behind on the
> > filesystem we should advise the caller to run xfs_repair, whether that's
> > because the caller told us to fix things and we failed, or because the
> > caller trusts xfs_scrub to find the errors but not to fix them and
> > therefore ran xfs_scrub -n. Either way you have a broken fs and need to
> > repair it.
> >
> > However, I wonder if you're thinking "the user told (scrub) they didn't
> > want to change anything, so why would we advise the user to run a
> > (repair) tool that changes things"?
>
> I guess my thinking is that in reality the user has two options and the
> tool is issuing a specific instruction to use only one of them. I don't
> think we can guess what the user does or doesn't trust.
>
> Perhaps just something along the lines of
>
> if (ctx->need_repair) {
> fprintf(stderr, _("%s: Unmount and run xfs_repair.\n"),
> ctx->mntpoint);
"need_repair" has been changed to "scrub_setup_succeeded".
> if (ctx->mode = SCRUB_MODE_DRY_RUN)
> fprintf(stderr, _("%s: Or, re-run without '-n'.\n"),
> ctx->mntpoint);
I'll do that, but not until the patch that adds fs repair
functionality to xfs_scrub.
--D
> }
>
> or whatever ordering/phrasing makes sense?
>
> -Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 19:12 [PATCH 00/16] xfsprogs: misc fixes, geometry refactoring Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] misc: fix gcc 7.3 warnings Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-02 22:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs_db: don't crash in ablock if there's no inode Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 03/16] xfs_scrub: log operational messages when interactive Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 19:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 04/16] xfs_scrub: don't ask user to run xfs_repair for only warnings Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 17:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 18:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 18:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 19:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-03-08 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 20:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 05/16] xfs_scrub: fix #include ordering to avoid build failure Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 17:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 06/16] xfs_scrub: don't try to scan xattrs if bstat says there aren't any Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 17:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 07/16] xfs_db: print transaction reservation type information Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 19:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:13 ` [PATCH 08/16] xfs_repair: don't fail directory repairs when grabbing inodes Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 19:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 19:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 20:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 09/16] misc: enable link time optimization, if requested Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-07 3:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 10/16] libfrog: refactor fs geometry printing function Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 11/16] mkfs: use geometry generation / helper functions Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 12/16] xfs_db: add a superblock info command Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-06 19:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 19:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 20:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 13/16] xfs_spaceman: " Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 14/16] xfs_info: move to xfs_spaceman Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-07 3:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-07 20:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 4:17 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 15/16] xfs_info: call xfs_db for offline filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-01 19:14 ` [PATCH 16/16] xfs_growfs: refactor geometry reporting Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-07 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 17/16] xfs_spaceman: only produce info for root of mounted xfs Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180306232424.GQ18989@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).