From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsck.xfs: allow forced repairs using xfs_repair
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:11:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315181120.GA4865@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315175026.34779-1-jtulak@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:50:26PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote:
> The fsck.xfs script did nothing, because xfs doesn't need a fsck to be
> run on every unclean shutdown. However, sometimes it may happen that the
> root filesystem really requires the usage of xfs_repair and then it is a
> hassle. This patch makes the situation a bit easier by detecting forced
> checks (/forcefsck or fsck.mode=force), so user can require the repair,
> without the repair being run all the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v3:
> - too quick with fixing in v2... add line at the end of the file
> v2:
> - return the "exit 0" at the end
>
> v1:
> - test for xfs_repair binary
> - run only in non-interactive session
> - translate xfs_repair return codes to fsck ones
> - run only if the filesystem is not mounted
> - add manpage update
> ---
> fsck/xfs_fsck.sh | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> man/man8/fsck.xfs.8 | 12 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fsck/xfs_fsck.sh b/fsck/xfs_fsck.sh
> index e52969e4..0ec6b049 100755
> --- a/fsck/xfs_fsck.sh
> +++ b/fsck/xfs_fsck.sh
> @@ -3,11 +3,42 @@
> # Copyright (c) 2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> #
>
> +NAME=$0
> +
> +# get the right return code for fsck
> +function repair2fsck_code() {
> + case $1 in
> + 0) return 0 # everything is ok
> + ;;
> + 1) echo "$NAME error: xfs_repair could not fix the filesystem." 1>&2
> + return 4 # errors left uncorrected
> + ;;
> + 2) echo "$NAME error: The filesystem to be checked must not be mounted." 1>&2
> + return 4 # it should not me mounted during boot, something is wrong
> + ;;
> + 3) return 1 # The fs has been fixed
> + ;;
> + *) echo "$NAME error: An unknown return code from xfs_repair '$1'" 1>&2
> + return 4 # something went wrong with xfs_repair
> + esac
> +}
> +
> +function ensure_not_mounted() {
> + local dev=$1
> + mounted=`grep -c "^$dev " /proc/mounts`
> + if [ $mounted -ne 0 ]; then
> + echo "$NAME error: The filesystem to be checked must not be mounted." 1>&2
> + exit 4
> + fi
> +}
> +
> AUTO=false
> -while getopts ":aApy" c
> +FORCE=false
> +while getopts ":aApyf" c
> do
> case $c in
> a|A|p|y) AUTO=true;;
> + f) FORCE=true;;
> esac
> done
> eval DEV=\${$#}
> @@ -15,6 +46,38 @@ if [ ! -e $DEV ]; then
> echo "$0: $DEV does not exist"
> exit 8
> fi
> +
> +# The flag -f is added by systemd/init scripts when /forcefsck file is present
> +# or fsck.mode=force is used during boot; an unclean shutdown won't trigger
> +# this check, user has to explicitly require a forced fsck.
> +# But first of all, test if it is a non-interactive session. Use multiple
> +# methods to capture most of the cases:
> +# The case for *i* and -n "$PS1" are commonly suggested in bash manual
> +# and the -t 0 test checks stdin
> +case $- in
> + *i*) FORCE=false ;;
> +esac
> +if [ -n "$PS1" -o -t 0 ]; then
> + FORCE=false
> +fi
> +
> +if $FORCE; then
> + if [ -f /sbin/xfs_repair ]; then
> + BIN="/sbin/xfs_repair"
> + elif [ -f /usr/sbin/xfs_repair ]; then
> + BIN="/usr/sbin/xfs_repair"
Can we just run xfs_repair and assume it's in the PATH?
> + else
> + echo "$NAME error: xfs_repair was not found!" 1>&2
> + exit 4
> + fi
> +
> + ensure_not_mounted $DEV
> +
> + $BIN -e $DEV
> + repair2fsck_code $?
> + exit $?
> +fi
> +
> if $AUTO; then
> echo "$0: XFS file system."
> else
> diff --git a/man/man8/fsck.xfs.8 b/man/man8/fsck.xfs.8
> index ace7252d..3eb3ad7f 100644
> --- a/man/man8/fsck.xfs.8
> +++ b/man/man8/fsck.xfs.8
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> .TH fsck.xfs 8
> .SH NAME
> -fsck.xfs \- do nothing, successfully
> +fsck.xfs \- do nothing, successfuly
successfully has two 'l'.
> .SH SYNOPSIS
> .B fsck.xfs
> [
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ If you wish to check the consistency of an XFS filesystem,
> or repair a damaged or corrupt XFS filesystem,
> see
> .BR xfs_repair (8).
> +.PP
> +However, it may happen that a forced repair is required and in makes sense to start
> +.BR xfs_repair (8)
> +on startup (either using /forcefsck file or fsck.mode=force kernel option). In this case
> +.B fsck.xfs
> +run
> +.B xfs_repair
> +for the user. But if run outside of boot environment or without the
> +.B -f
> +option, it does nothing.
Bleh, I hate manpages. I'll just ... do this without the formatting.
However, the system administrator can force fsck.xfs to run
xfs_repair(8) by creating a /forcefsck file, booting the system with
"fsck.mode=force" on the kernel command line, or by running fsck.xfs -f.
--D
> .
> .SH FILES
> .IR /etc/fstab .
> --
> 2.15.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 15:05 [PATCH] fsck.xfs: allow forced repairs using xfs_repair Jan Tulak
2018-03-05 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 22:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-05 22:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-05 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 23:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-06 11:51 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-06 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-08 10:57 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-08 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-08 22:36 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-14 13:51 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-14 15:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-14 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-15 17:01 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-08 23:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-14 13:30 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-14 15:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-15 11:16 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-15 17:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_repair: add flag -e to detect corrected errors Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 17:45 ` [PATCH 2/2 v1] fsck.xfs: allow forced repairs using xfs_repair Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 18:11 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-03-15 18:22 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] " Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 18:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-16 10:19 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-16 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-16 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Jan Tulak
2018-03-23 2:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-23 3:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-23 3:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-23 3:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-23 14:00 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-23 14:14 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-23 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] " Jan Tulak
2022-09-28 5:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-29 8:31 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-03-15 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_repair: add flag -e to detect corrected errors Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-15 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Jan Tulak
2018-03-15 18:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-23 1:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-23 9:24 ` Jan Tulak
2018-03-23 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] xfs_repair: add flag -e to modify exit code for " Jan Tulak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315181120.GA4865@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=jtulak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).