linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linuxxfs@indeed.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 07:59:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180316115910.GA51225@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315222605.GK18129@dastard>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:26:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:38:39AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:42:50PM -0500, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> > > <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:17:24PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > ...
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linuxxfs@indeed.com>
> > > 
> > > I'm also assuming this will get submitted back to the linux-stable
> > > trees as the agfl packing change is already causing issues in the
> > > stable trees.  If you do not intend to push it into the linux-stable
> > > trees let me know and I'll take care of at least the major ones.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, I can cc stable in the next post along with the other minor fixes.
> > My question is how far back should this fix go? Was the plan to only go
> > back to v4.5 because that is where the packing fix first went in? Or
> > should this go back further because it looks like the packing fix was
> > backported to v3.10:
> > 
> > $ git show 96f859d52bcb1
> > commit 96f859d52bcb1c6ea6f3388d39862bf7143e2f30
> > Author: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > Date:   Mon Jan 4 16:13:21 2016 +1100
> > 
> >     libxfs: pack the agfl header structure so XFS_AGFL_SIZE is correct
> >     
> >     ...
> >     
> >     cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10 - 4.4
> >     Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >     Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> 
> 3.10 was when the problem was first introduced. I have no idea
> whether it got backported that far but the stable kernel
> maintainers, so you'll have to manually audit all current long-term
> stable kernels to determine what kernels need backports.
> 

The earliest I saw it backported was to 3.16, which looks like Luis had
perhaps done that one. Otherwise, the kernels Darrick pointed out seem
to have the fix.

Brian

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2018-03-16 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-14 17:17 [PATCH] xfs: detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl Brian Foster
2018-03-14 18:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-14 20:42   ` Dave Chiluk
2018-03-15 10:38     ` Brian Foster
2018-03-15 15:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-03-15 16:27         ` Dave Chiluk
2018-03-15 22:48           ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-15 22:26       ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-16 11:59         ` Brian Foster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180316115910.GA51225@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=chiluk+linuxxfs@indeed.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).