linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fs: don't scan the inode cache before SB_BORN is set
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:24:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327072445.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327065756.GO18129@dastard>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>  	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_BORN))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
>  		total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
>  
> @@ -1227,7 +1237,13 @@ mount_fs(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, const char *name, void *data)
>  	sb = root->d_sb;
>  	BUG_ON(!sb);
>  	WARN_ON(!sb->s_bdi);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Write barrier is for super_cache_count() to ensure it does not run
> +	 * until after the superblock is fully set up.
> +	 */
>  	sb->s_flags |= SB_BORN;
> +	smp_wmb();


Umm...  OK, I'm nearly asleep right now, but... shouldn't that be

	if (check ->s_flags)
		bugger off
	smp_rmb();
	loads
vs.
	stores
	smp_wmb();
	store ->s_flags?

IOW, your barriers seem to be in the wrong places...

      reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-26  4:35 [PATCH] fs: don't scan the inode cache before SB_ACTIVE is set Dave Chinner
2018-03-26  5:31 ` Al Viro
2018-03-26  5:51   ` Al Viro
2018-03-26  6:33     ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-26  6:55       ` Al Viro
2018-03-26  7:21         ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-27  6:57 ` [PATCH V2] fs: don't scan the inode cache before SB_BORN " Dave Chinner
2018-03-27  7:24   ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327072445.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).