From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:33052 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483AbeDEVoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:44:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:44:04 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: use hardlimit as sub-fs size if both hard/soft limits are set Message-ID: <20180405214404.GF23861@dastard> References: <1521954996-203628-1-git-send-email-cgxu519@gmx.com> <20180326192259.GU4818@magnolia> <66BA750A-5A49-4B81-BC99-40DC89216856@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66BA750A-5A49-4B81-BC99-40DC89216856@gmx.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "cgxu519@gmx.com" Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Brian Foster , Eric Sandeen On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:40:03AM +0800, cgxu519@gmx.com wrote: > Hi Dave, Christoph > > Any objection for this? Silence generally means "I don't really care". Rule of thumb: if it's user visible and likely to be used in scripts, then we have to be really careful about changing behaviour as it can break user scripts. This ticks both boxes, so I'd be wanting more justification than "I noticed this" as a reason for changing it. Darrick seems to be covering that concern just fine :) -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com