From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] xfs: superblock scrub should use uncached buffers
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:29:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180421002916.GD24738@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420000716.GT23861@dastard>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:07:16AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 02:57:23PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:25:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:55:47AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:40:20PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > We've never cached buffers when reading or writing superblocks, so we
> > > > > need to change scrub to do likewise or risk screwing up the uncached sb
> > > > > buffer usage everywhere else.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, so this goes back to this[1] thread, right?
> > >
> > > Yep.
> > >
> > > > IIRC, we wanted to end up with an lru-bypassing uncached buffer lookup
> > > > mechanism to provide uncached behavior for resource-saving purposes
> > > > but without introducing serialization issues between multiple users of
> > > > uncached buffers.
> > >
> > > Right.
> > >
> > > > On a quick look back, growfs currently uses cached buffers for secondary
> > > > superblocks and the associated patch was looking to change that to
> > > > something like the above. Don't we have the same requirement here (since
> > > > growfs currently still uses cached buffers)?
> > >
> > > Correct, this patch is contingent on landing Dave's "tableise growfs"
> > > series that converts growfs to use uncached buffers for writing out the
> > > new secondary supers. If I manage to land Dave's growfs thing before
> > > repair then I'll keep this; if repair goes first I'll defer it to that
> > > series.
> > >
> >
> > Ok, though I'm not sure I see the need for the higher level series
> > dependency. Don't one of these patches just need to fold in a helper[1]
> > to set the lru reference appropriately and start to use it?
>
> Yes, that would work. :P
Ok, I'll fold that into my patch and I'll fix things up depending on who
wins the race.
I changed the ASSERT to trip on agno == 0, btw.
--D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-21 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-18 2:39 [PATCH 00/11] xfs-4.18: online scrub fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 2:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: skip scrub xref if corruption already noted Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 15:03 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 16:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 2:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: create the XFS_QMOPT_QUOTIP_LOCKED flag Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 15:33 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 17:09 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-19 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-21 18:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 2:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: report failing address when dquot verifier fails Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 18:33 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: refactor dquot iteration Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 18:34 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 22:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: avoid ilock games in the quota scrubber Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 18:34 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: quota scrub should use bmapbtd scrubber Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-18 18:34 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 20:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 11:20 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: superblock scrub should use uncached buffers Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 12:55 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-19 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 18:57 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-20 0:07 ` Dave Chinner
2018-04-21 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-04-20 0:05 ` Dave Chinner
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: clean up scrub usage of KM_NOFS Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 12:55 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: btree scrub should check minrecs Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 12:55 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: refactor scrub transaction allocation function Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 12:56 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-18 2:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: avoid ABBA deadlock when scrubbing parent pointers Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 12:56 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-19 17:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-19 18:58 ` Brian Foster
2018-04-19 19:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-04-21 0:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180421002916.GD24738@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).