From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:48938 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752083AbeD1Gro (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 02:47:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 23:47:39 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] xfs: rename on-disk dquot counter zap functions Message-ID: <20180428064739.GE1661@magnolia> References: <152440954198.29601.14390250048915099607.stgit@magnolia> <152440963795.29601.14844972913332721242.stgit@magnolia> <20180423173548.GL834@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180423173548.GL834@lst.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I agree with getting rid of the old names, but what about > > xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts_buf and xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts_all to fit with > the naming for the existing xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts low-level function? Sounds good to me. --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html