* [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount
@ 2018-05-02 19:56 Eric Sandeen
2018-05-02 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2018-05-02 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
After we lost ustat(2) in commit 4e7a824, we ended up with a slightly
bonkers method to determine if our target block device was mounted:
it goes through every entry returned by getmntent and stats the dir
to see if its underlying device matches ours.
Unfortunately that dir might be a hung nfs server and sadness ensues.
So do some pre-checks; can we stat the mounted "device?" If so is
it really a block device? If not, skip it.
Fixes: 4e7a824 ("libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat")
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/libxfs/linux.c b/libxfs/linux.c
index 0bace3e..7350fa7 100644
--- a/libxfs/linux.c
+++ b/libxfs/linux.c
@@ -77,7 +77,21 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block, struct stat *s, int flags)
progname, name);
return 1;
}
+ /*
+ * This whole business is to work out if our block device is mounted
+ * after we lost ustat(2), see:
+ * 4e7a824 libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
+ * We don't really want to stat every single mounted directory,
+ * as that may include tmpfs, cgroups, procfs or - worst - hung nfs
+ * servers. So we check the "device" before going after the mountpoint.
+ */
while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
+ /* If the "fsname" is't a stat-able device, skip it */
+ if (stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &mst) < 0)
+ continue;
+ if (!S_ISBLK(mst.st_mode))
+ continue;
+ /* Ok, this entry does seem to be a mounted block device */
if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &mst) < 0)
continue;
if (mst.st_dev != s->st_rdev)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount
2018-05-02 19:56 [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount Eric Sandeen
@ 2018-05-02 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 21:58 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2018-05-02 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 02:56:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After we lost ustat(2) in commit 4e7a824, we ended up with a slightly
> bonkers method to determine if our target block device was mounted:
> it goes through every entry returned by getmntent and stats the dir
> to see if its underlying device matches ours.
>
> Unfortunately that dir might be a hung nfs server and sadness ensues.
>
> So do some pre-checks; can we stat the mounted "device?" If so is
> it really a block device? If not, skip it.
>
> Fixes: 4e7a824 ("libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> ---
>
> diff --git a/libxfs/linux.c b/libxfs/linux.c
> index 0bace3e..7350fa7 100644
> --- a/libxfs/linux.c
> +++ b/libxfs/linux.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,21 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block, struct stat *s, int flags)
> progname, name);
> return 1;
> }
> + /*
> + * This whole business is to work out if our block device is mounted
> + * after we lost ustat(2), see:
> + * 4e7a824 libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
> + * We don't really want to stat every single mounted directory,
> + * as that may include tmpfs, cgroups, procfs or - worst - hung nfs
> + * servers. So we check the "device" before going after the mountpoint.
> + */
> while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
> + /* If the "fsname" is't a stat-able device, skip it */
> + if (stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &mst) < 0)
> + continue;
> + if (!S_ISBLK(mst.st_mode))
> + continue;
> + /* Ok, this entry does seem to be a mounted block device */
> if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &mst) < 0)
> continue;
> if (mst.st_dev != s->st_rdev)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount
2018-05-02 19:56 [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount Eric Sandeen
2018-05-02 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2018-05-02 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 21:58 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2018-05-02 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 02:56:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After we lost ustat(2) in commit 4e7a824, we ended up with a slightly
> bonkers method to determine if our target block device was mounted:
> it goes through every entry returned by getmntent and stats the dir
> to see if its underlying device matches ours.
>
> Unfortunately that dir might be a hung nfs server and sadness ensues.
>
> So do some pre-checks; can we stat the mounted "device?" If so is
> it really a block device? If not, skip it.
>
> Fixes: 4e7a824 ("libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/libxfs/linux.c b/libxfs/linux.c
> index 0bace3e..7350fa7 100644
> --- a/libxfs/linux.c
> +++ b/libxfs/linux.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,21 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block, struct stat *s, int flags)
> progname, name);
> return 1;
> }
> + /*
> + * This whole business is to work out if our block device is mounted
> + * after we lost ustat(2), see:
> + * 4e7a824 libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
> + * We don't really want to stat every single mounted directory,
> + * as that may include tmpfs, cgroups, procfs or - worst - hung nfs
> + * servers. So we check the "device" before going after the mountpoint.
> + */
> while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
> + /* If the "fsname" is't a stat-able device, skip it */
> + if (stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &mst) < 0)
> + continue;
> + if (!S_ISBLK(mst.st_mode))
> + continue;
That'll break with subvolumes - we'll be mounting regular files, not
block devices....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH V2] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount
2018-05-02 19:56 [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount Eric Sandeen
2018-05-02 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2018-05-22 21:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-05-23 3:37 ` Allison Henderson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2018-05-22 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: Dave Chinner
After we lost ustat(2) in commit 4e7a824, we ended up with a slightly
bonkers method to determine if our target block device was mounted:
it goes through every entry returned by getmntent and stats the dir
to see if its underlying device matches ours.
Unfortunately that dir might be a hung nfs server and sadness ensues.
So just do a really simple sanity check before we try to stat the
mountpoint: does its device start with a / ? If not, skip it.
Fixes: 4e7a824 ("libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat")
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
V2: just look for fully-qualified device paths vs expecting an actual
block device.
diff --git a/libxfs/linux.c b/libxfs/linux.c
index 0bace3e..5c8602e 100644
--- a/libxfs/linux.c
+++ b/libxfs/linux.c
@@ -77,7 +77,17 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block, struct stat *s, int flags)
progname, name);
return 1;
}
+ /*
+ * This whole business is to work out if our block device is mounted
+ * after we lost ustat(2), see:
+ * 4e7a824 libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
+ * We don't really want to stat every single mounted directory,
+ * as that may include tmpfs, cgroups, procfs or - worst - hung nfs
+ * servers. So first, a simple check: does the "dev" start with "/" ?
+ */
while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
+ if (mnt->mnt_fsname[0] != '/')
+ continue;
if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &mst) < 0)
continue;
if (mst.st_dev != s->st_rdev)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V2] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount
2018-05-22 21:58 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
@ 2018-05-23 3:37 ` Allison Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Allison Henderson @ 2018-05-23 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, linux-xfs; +Cc: Dave Chinner
Looks ok to me. You can add my review.
Reviewed by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Thanks!
On 05/22/2018 02:58 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After we lost ustat(2) in commit 4e7a824, we ended up with a slightly
> bonkers method to determine if our target block device was mounted:
> it goes through every entry returned by getmntent and stats the dir
> to see if its underlying device matches ours.
>
> Unfortunately that dir might be a hung nfs server and sadness ensues.
>
> So just do a really simple sanity check before we try to stat the
> mountpoint: does its device start with a / ? If not, skip it.
>
> Fixes: 4e7a824 ("libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> V2: just look for fully-qualified device paths vs expecting an actual
> block device.
>
> diff --git a/libxfs/linux.c b/libxfs/linux.c
> index 0bace3e..5c8602e 100644
> --- a/libxfs/linux.c
> +++ b/libxfs/linux.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,17 @@ platform_check_mount(char *name, char *block, struct
> stat *s, int flags)
> progname, name);
> return 1;
> }
> + /*
> + * This whole business is to work out if our block device is mounted
> + * after we lost ustat(2), see:
> + * 4e7a824 libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat
> + * We don't really want to stat every single mounted directory,
> + * as that may include tmpfs, cgroups, procfs or - worst - hung nfs
> + * servers. So first, a simple check: does the "dev" start with "/" ?
> + */
> while ((mnt = getmntent(f)) != NULL) {
> + if (mnt->mnt_fsname[0] != '/')
> + continue;
> if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &mst) < 0)
> continue;
> if (mst.st_dev != s->st_rdev)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwICaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=R6pqMHln20gGSsVL6glkacPVahf-7ntcy9uginrHVqU&s=svjEUGJ89ba2TeolXCPU9AjtORnBzV-56WGzef1Q6X0&e=
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-23 3:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-02 19:56 [PATCH] xfsprogs: be careful about what we stat in platform_check_mount Eric Sandeen
2018-05-02 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 21:58 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2018-05-23 3:37 ` Allison Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox