From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs/439: repair corrupted filesystem afterwards
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 09:15:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503011522.GA8373@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502145442.GR4127@magnolia>
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 07:54:42AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:51:45PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:39:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > After we mess with logsunit and test that we can't mount the fs, repair
> > > the filesystem to make sure that repair can deal with it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/xfs/439 | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/439 b/tests/xfs/439
> > > index 215c4b90..9d5f6892 100755
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/439
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/439
> > > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ fi
> > > _check_dmesg _filter_assert_dmesg
> > >
> > > echo "Silence is golden"
> > > +_scratch_xfs_repair >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >
> > But how should we check if repair does fix the corruption? I tried
> > adding a "scratch_mount" after the repair and expected a success mount.
> > But that mount also failed, and repair didn't report anything wrong in
> > $seqres.full. Looks like the corruption was not detected nor repaired.
> >
> > [ 8278.679149] XFS (dm-1): Mounting V5 Filesystem
> > [ 8278.679743] XFS (dm-1): log stripe unit 4095 bytes must be a multiple of block size
> > [ 8278.680583] XFS (dm-1): AAIEEE! Log failed size checks. Abort!
> > [ 8278.681817] XFS (dm-1): log mount failed
> >
> > Note that I was using latest for-next branch of xfsprogs.
>
> Aha! This depends on "xfs_repair: validate some of the log space
> information" which is still out for review for xfs_repair 4.17. We can
> drop this for now. I'll add a _scratch_mount at the end before I
> resubmit this patch.
Then the test would start to fail because of the newly added
_scratch_mount test on systems that have old xfs_repair. I think it's
better to add a new regression test for that xfs_repair fix.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 15:39 [PATCH 0/9] misc. fstests changes Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] generic: test XATTR_REPLACE doesn't take the fs down Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 7:33 ` Eryu Guan
2018-05-02 14:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs/439: repair corrupted filesystem afterwards Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 7:51 ` Eryu Guan
2018-05-02 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-03 1:15 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] generic/45[34]: add unicode directional override checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] generic/45[34]: check unicode names only if xfs_scrub linked against libicu Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] generic/45[34]: test unicode confusables Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] generic/453: test creation of malicious directory entries Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:40 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs/422: add fsstress to the freeze-and-rmap-repair race test Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 8:44 ` Eryu Guan
2018-05-02 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:40 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: checkbashisms in all script files Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 8:55 ` Eryu Guan
2018-05-02 9:13 ` Jan Tulak
2018-05-02 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-01 15:40 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: fix blocktrash fuzzers Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503011522.GA8373@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).