From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: don't discard on free of unwritten extents
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:35:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507233512.GI23861@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507181138.43250-4-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 02:11:37PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Unwritten extents by definition have not been written to until they
> are converted to normal written extents. If unwritten extents are
> freed from a file, it is therefore guaranteed that the blocks have
> not been written to since allocation (note that zero range punches
> and reallocates blocks).
>
> To cut down on online discards generated from workloads that make
> use of preallocation, skip discards of extents if they are in the
> unwritten state when the extent is freed.
>
> Note that this optimization does not apply to log recovery, during
> which all freed extents are discarded if online discard is enabled.
> Also note that it may be possible for a filesystem crash to occur
> after write completion of an unwritten extent but before unwritten
> conversion such that the extent remains unwritten after log
> recovery. Since this pseudo-inconsistency may already be possible
> after a crash (consider writing to recently allocated blocks where
> the allocation transaction is lost after a crash), this change
> shouldn't introduce any fundamental limitations that don't already
> exist. In short, on storage stacks where discards are important,
> it's good practice to run an occasional fstrim even with online
> discard enabled in the filesystem, particularly after a crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index b171f4185adb..a50c197d426f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -5107,7 +5107,8 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
> if (error)
> goto done;
> } else {
> - if (bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD)
> + if (bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD ||
> + del->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN)
Doesn't gcc warn about parenthesis challenged logic like this by
default these days?
I also find code with multi-line function calls easier to follow if
there are {} aroudn them like so:
if ((bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD) ||
del->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN) {
> xfs_bmap_add_free_nodiscard(mp, dfops,
> del->br_startblock, del->br_blockcount,
> NULL);
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 18:11 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: skip unnecessary discards Brian Foster
2018-05-07 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: add bmapi nodiscard flag Brian Foster
2018-05-07 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: skip online discard during eofblocks trims Brian Foster
2018-05-07 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-08 12:35 ` Brian Foster
2018-05-07 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: don't discard on free of unwritten extents Brian Foster
2018-05-07 23:35 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-05-08 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2018-05-07 18:11 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xfs: convert speculative preallocation to " Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180507233512.GI23861@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox