From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] xfs: don't assert when on-disk btree pointers are garbage
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:55:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180603235520.GB10363@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180603234930.GZ10363@dastard>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:49:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 04:22:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Don't ASSERT when we encounter bad on-disk btree pointers in the debug
> > check functions. Log the error to leave breadcrumbs and let the upper
> > layers deal with it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Isn't this the same checks that were in the last patch? Can
> you lift xfs_btree_check_ptr() out of the debug only code, and
> make the previous patch call it?
Another thought on this - we can get rid of all the ifdef DEBUG
wrappers around xfs_btree_check_ptr() for debug kernels by adding:
#ifdef DEBUG
#define xfs_btree_debug_check_ptr xfs_btree_check_ptr
else
#define xfs_btree_debug_check_ptr(...) 0
#endif
or do something like xfs_dir3_data_check/__xfs_dir3_data_check().
That will clean the core btree code up a fair bit...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-03 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-03 23:22 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: fix various checking problems Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: don't forbid setting dax flag on directories if device doesn't dax Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:41 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-04 4:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: strengthen btree pointer checks before use Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: don't assert when on-disk btree pointers are garbage Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:49 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:55 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-06-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: check directory bestfree information in the verifier Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-04 4:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: don't assert when reporting on-disk corruption while loading btree Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:23 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: remove redundant ASSERT on insufficient bestfree length in _leaf_addname Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:11 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:23 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: xfs_alloc_get_rec should return EFSCORRUPTED for obvious bnobt corruption Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-04 4:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:23 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: btree lookup shouldn't ASSERT on empty btree nodes Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:23 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: don't ASSERT on short form btree root pointer of zero Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:15 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: don't return garbage buffers in xfs_da3_node_read Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-04 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180603235520.GB10363@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox