* [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_trans_getsb in xfs_sync_sb_buf
@ 2018-06-04 23:50 Eric Sandeen
2018-06-05 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2018-06-04 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
Use xfs_trans_getsb rather than reaching right in for
mp->m_sb_bp; I think this is more correct, and it facilitates
building this libxfs code in userspace as well.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
This passes the online label test ... tbh I'm not quite
sure if I'm unwinding/unlocking/putting the bp properly
here, though, so ... eyes & advice appreciated?
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index 0bc0a40764e1..5f25aac04aa9 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -897,14 +897,16 @@ xfs_sync_sb_buf(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
struct xfs_trans *tp;
+ struct xfs_buf *bp;
int error;
error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_sb, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
if (error)
return error;
+ bp = xfs_trans_getsb(tp, mp, 0);
xfs_log_sb(tp);
- xfs_trans_bhold(tp, mp->m_sb_bp);
+ xfs_trans_bhold(tp, bp);
xfs_trans_set_sync(tp);
error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
if (error)
@@ -912,9 +914,9 @@ xfs_sync_sb_buf(
/*
* write out the sb buffer to get the changes to disk
*/
- error = xfs_bwrite(mp->m_sb_bp);
+ error = xfs_bwrite(bp);
out:
- xfs_buf_relse(mp->m_sb_bp);
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
return error;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_trans_getsb in xfs_sync_sb_buf
2018-06-04 23:50 [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_trans_getsb in xfs_sync_sb_buf Eric Sandeen
@ 2018-06-05 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2018-06-05 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:50:05PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Use xfs_trans_getsb rather than reaching right in for
> mp->m_sb_bp; I think this is more correct, and it facilitates
> building this libxfs code in userspace as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This passes the online label test ... tbh I'm not quite
> sure if I'm unwinding/unlocking/putting the bp properly
> here, though, so ... eyes & advice appreciated?
I think it's ok - the transaction context is gone with the commit,
so xfs_trans_brelse() would just call xfs_buf_relse() anyway.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-05 0:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-04 23:50 [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_trans_getsb in xfs_sync_sb_buf Eric Sandeen
2018-06-05 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox