From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs: verify COW extent size hint is valid in inode verifier
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605170947.GI9437@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605062423.4877-4-david@fromorbit.com>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 04:24:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> There are rules for vald extent size hints. We enforce them when
> applications set them, but fuzzers violate those rules and that
> screws us over. Validate COW extent size hint rules in the inode
> verifier to catch this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index be197c91307b..ea64be7cbd98 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
>
> /* extent size hint validation */
> fa = xfs_inode_validate_extsize(mp, be32_to_cpu(dip->di_extsize),
> - mode, be32_to_cpu(dip->di_flags));
> + mode, flags);
> if (fa)
> return fa;
>
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
>
> /* don't allow reflink/cowextsize if we don't have reflink */
> if ((flags2 & (XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK | XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE)) &&
> - !xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb))
> + !xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb))
These two bits belong in the previous patch, but I'll fix them on the
way in.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> return __this_address;
>
> /* only regular files get reflink */
> @@ -531,6 +531,12 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
> if ((flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK) && (flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_DAX))
> return __this_address;
>
> + /* COW extent size hint validation */
> + fa = xfs_inode_validate_cowextsize(mp, be32_to_cpu(dip->di_cowextsize),
> + mode, flags, flags2);
> + if (fa)
> + return fa;
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-05 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 6:24 [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: more verifications! Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: catch bad stripe alignment configurations Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 9:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: verify extent size hint is valid in inode verifier Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 9:53 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 22:56 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08 1:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-08 1:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08 2:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-24 6:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-24 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-20 15:06 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-20 15:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-20 15:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-20 15:59 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-20 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-21 10:56 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-22 0:41 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: verify COW " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:00 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: validate btree records on retreival Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:40 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:42 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-05 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-06 1:21 ` [PATCH 4/6 v3] " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: verify root inode more thoroughly Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:50 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: push corruption -> ESTALE conversion to xfs_nfs_get_inode() Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 11:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180605170947.GI9437@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).