From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] xfs: validate btree records on retreival
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:02:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605230246.GL10363@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605174716.GM9437@magnolia>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:47:16AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 04:40:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > @@ -111,16 +111,51 @@ xfs_refcount_get_rec(
> > struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec,
> > int *stat)
> > {
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = cur->bc_mp;
> > + xfs_agnumber_t agno = cur->bc_private.a.agno;
> > union xfs_btree_rec *rec;
> > int error;
> > + xfs_agblock_t realstart;
> >
> > error = xfs_btree_get_rec(cur, &rec, stat);
> > - if (!error && *stat == 1) {
> > - xfs_refcount_btrec_to_irec(rec, irec);
> > - trace_xfs_refcount_get(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno,
> > - irec);
> > + if (error || !*stat)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + xfs_refcount_btrec_to_irec(rec, irec);
> > +
> > + agno = cur->bc_private.a.agno;
> > + if (irec->rc_blockcount == 0 || irec->rc_blockcount > MAXREFCEXTLEN)
> > + goto out_bad_rec;
> > +
> > + /* handle special COW-staging state */
> > + realstart = irec->rc_startblock;
> > + if (realstart & XFS_REFC_COW_START) {
> > + if (irec->rc_refcount != 1)
> > + goto out_bad_rec;
> > + realstart &= ~XFS_REFC_COW_START;
> > }
>
> If the record does not have the cow "flag" set then the refcount cannot
> be 1, so this needs an else clause:
>
> } else {
> if (irec->rc_refcount == 1)
> goto out_bad_rec;
> }
Ah, yes, that is true, though it should be refcount < 2 because a
zero value is invalid, too.
> > + if (irec->rm_owner == 0)
> > + goto out_bad_rec;
> > + if (irec->rm_owner > XFS_MAXINUMBER &&
> > + irec->rm_owner <= XFS_RMAP_OWN_MIN)
>
> rm_owner should be (between XFS_RMAP_OWN_FS and XFS_RMAP_OWN_MIN) or
> (pass xfs_verify_fsino()) since we cannot have inodes between EOFS and
> MAXINUMBER.
Yes, that is better. I should have noticed xfs_verify_fsino() - my
bad.
>
> > + goto out_bad_rec;
> > +
>
> Should we check the rmap flags here?
They are checked in xfs_refcount_btrec_to_irec(), and it returns
-EFSCORRUPTED if invalid flags are set.
> > + return 0;
> > +out_bad_rec:
> > + xfs_warn(mp,
> > + "RMAP BTree record corruption in AG %d detected!", agno);
>
> "RMap" ? Or "Reverse Mapping"?
>
> (Consistent capitalization blah blah...)
I'll use the latter.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-05 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 6:24 [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: more verifications! Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: catch bad stripe alignment configurations Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 9:27 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: verify extent size hint is valid in inode verifier Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 9:53 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 22:56 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08 1:10 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-08 1:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08 2:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-24 6:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-24 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-20 15:06 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-20 15:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-20 15:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-20 15:59 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-20 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-21 10:56 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-22 0:41 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: verify COW " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:00 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: validate btree records on retreival Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:40 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:42 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-05 23:02 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-06-06 1:21 ` [PATCH 4/6 v3] " Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: verify root inode more thoroughly Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 10:50 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: push corruption -> ESTALE conversion to xfs_nfs_get_inode() Dave Chinner
2018-06-05 11:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-06-05 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180605230246.GL10363@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).