public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: setup VFS i_rwsem lockdep state correctly
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:32:36 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607053236.GR10363@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607052132.6207-2-david@fromorbit.com>

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:21:31PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> When lockdep is enabled, it changes the type of the inode i_rwsem
> semaphore before unlocking a newly instantiated inode. THere is the
> possibility that there is already a waiter on that inode lock by the
> time we unlock the new inode, so having lockdep re-initialise the
> lock is a vector for trouble.
> 
> Avoid this whole situation by setting up the i_rwsem lockdep class
> at the same time we set up the XFS inode i_ilock classes and so the
> VFS doesn't have to change the lock class itself when it is
> potentially unsafe.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

I just realised that the VFS equivalent patch has made it upstream,
too, which would help explain this a bit more. Darrick, can you add
this to the commit message:

"This change is necessary because the equivalent fixes to the VFS
code made in commit 1e2e547a93a0 ("do d_instantiate/unlock_new_inode
combinations safely") are not relevant to XFS as it has it's own
internal inode cache lookup and instantiation routines."

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-07  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07  5:21 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix a couple of potential deadlocks Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: setup VFS i_rwsem lockdep state correctly Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:32   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-06-07 11:41     ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07  5:50   ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07  5:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: xfs_reflink_convert_cow() memory allocation deadlock Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:56   ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 22:08       ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 11:41   ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07 14:48     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08  0:48     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180607053236.GR10363@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox