From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: setup VFS i_rwsem lockdep state correctly
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:32:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607053236.GR10363@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607052132.6207-2-david@fromorbit.com>
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:21:31PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When lockdep is enabled, it changes the type of the inode i_rwsem
> semaphore before unlocking a newly instantiated inode. THere is the
> possibility that there is already a waiter on that inode lock by the
> time we unlock the new inode, so having lockdep re-initialise the
> lock is a vector for trouble.
>
> Avoid this whole situation by setting up the i_rwsem lockdep class
> at the same time we set up the XFS inode i_ilock classes and so the
> VFS doesn't have to change the lock class itself when it is
> potentially unsafe.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
I just realised that the VFS equivalent patch has made it upstream,
too, which would help explain this a bit more. Darrick, can you add
this to the commit message:
"This change is necessary because the equivalent fixes to the VFS
code made in commit 1e2e547a93a0 ("do d_instantiate/unlock_new_inode
combinations safely") are not relevant to XFS as it has it's own
internal inode cache lookup and instantiation routines."
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 5:21 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix a couple of potential deadlocks Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 5:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: setup VFS i_rwsem lockdep state correctly Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 5:32 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-06-07 11:41 ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07 5:50 ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 5:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: xfs_reflink_convert_cow() memory allocation deadlock Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 5:56 ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 11:41 ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08 0:48 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180607053236.GR10363@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox