public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: xfs_reflink_convert_cow() memory allocation deadlock
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:48:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180608004829.GX10363@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607114140.GB7798@bfoster>

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:41:40AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:21:32PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > xfs_reflink_convert_cow() manipulates the incore extent list
> > in GFP_KERNEL context in the IO submission path whilst holding
> > locked pages under writeback. This is a memory reclaim deadlock
> > vector. This code is not in a transaction, so any memory allocations
> > it makes aren't protected via the memalloc_nofs_save() context that
> > transactions carry.
> > 
> > Hence we need to run this call under memalloc_nofs_save() context to
> > prevent potential memory allocations from being run as GFP_KERNEL
> > and deadlocking.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > ---
> 
> Looks fine modulo the header thing Allison already pointed out:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> 
> BTW, shouldn't we also be using XFS_TRANS_NOFS in
> xfs_iomap_write_allocate()?

Most likely, yes.

However, I think the whole ->writepages path should be moved under
memalloc_nofs_save() context. I'm kinda waiting for the bufferhead
removal to land before auditing it fully and determining the scope
we should be covering by nofs alloc contexts. This was just a
drive-by patch to fix a problem that was reported...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-08  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07  5:21 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix a couple of potential deadlocks Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: setup VFS i_rwsem lockdep state correctly Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:32   ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 11:41     ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07  5:50   ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07  5:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: xfs_reflink_convert_cow() memory allocation deadlock Dave Chinner
2018-06-07  5:56   ` Allison Henderson
2018-06-07 14:46     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-07 22:08       ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-07 11:41   ` Brian Foster
2018-06-07 14:48     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-08  0:48     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180608004829.GX10363@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox