linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Wen Xu <xuwen.sjtu@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in xfs_bmap_extents_to_btree() when mounting and operating a crafted image
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:32:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180630183239.GQ5711@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANrHXgw7qRwg7N6NuD5wXq4Tn-6ieZHoNHaJ_7yjV1YcaiW+Jg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:02:17PM -0400, Wen Xu wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Is the patch for this issue available online?...I would like to have a look.

Uh.... there were multiple problems found by this one fuzz case,
generating a few patches.  I /think/ with one exception they'll all be
in -rc3 if you want to retest.

--D

> Thanks,
> Wen
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:22:27PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 10:07:52PM -0400, Wen Xu wrote:
> >> But, yeah, xfs_db tells me the by-size freespace btree is full of
> >> crap, but the by-cnt tree is completely empty (i.e. corrupt) so
> >> allocation should definitely be failing long before if gets anywhere
> >> near returning an allocated block.
> >
> > Running a debug kernel assert fails in extent allocation setup for
> > writeback, tripping over a bad extent alignment. The superblock
> > has an invalid stripe alignment/width setup, which I've fixed.
> > The extent size hint on the inode also has an invalid alignment (not
> > a multiple of block size), which the inode verifiers will now catch,
> > such as this:
> >
> > XFS (loop0): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_inode_validate_extsize+0xe5/0x110, inode 0x6d5 dinode
> > XFS (loop0): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> > XFS (loop0): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> > ....
> >
> > And the alignment assert has now gone away. Now there's an assert
> > like this:
> >
> > XFS: Assertion failed: *len > 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c, line: 344
> > Call Trace:
> >  xfs_extent_busy_trim+0x243/0x250
> >  xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_exact+0xc3/0x3b0
> >  xfs_alloc_ag_vextent+0x1c9/0x330
> >  xfs_alloc_vextent+0x56a/0x870
> >  xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc+0x160/0x6f0
> >  xfs_dialloc+0x116/0x270
> >  xfs_ialloc+0x5c/0x5e0
> >  xfs_dir_ialloc+0x6a/0x260
> >  xfs_create+0x418/0x670
> >  xfs_generic_create+0x1f6/0x2c0
> >  vfs_create+0xf9/0x180
> >  do_mknodat+0x1f9/0x210
> >  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x180
> >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> >
> > I'm pretty sure this is because there are bogus extent records in
> > the free space tree - pretty sure we can catch them on lookup
> > via a change to ->init_key_from_rec() to validate the record before
> > letting them be used.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave.
> > --
> > Dave Chinner
> > david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2018-06-30 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-03 22:19 NULL pointer dereference in xfs_bmap_extents_to_btree() when mounting and operating a crafted image Wen Xu
2018-06-03 22:34 ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 22:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:03   ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-03 23:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-03 23:31     ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-04  2:07       ` Wen Xu
2018-06-04  4:22         ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-04  4:52           ` Wen Xu
2018-06-04  7:02           ` Dave Chinner
2018-06-29 17:02             ` Wen Xu
2018-06-30 18:32               ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180630183239.GQ5711@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xuwen.sjtu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).