linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:41:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180713164153.GM32415@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713131003.31121-1-billodo@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 08:10:03AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> Current sb verifier doesn't check bounds on sb_fdblocks and sb_ifree.
> Add sanity checks for these parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 350119eeaecb..cdede769ab88 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,9 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
>  	    sbp->sb_dblocks == 0					||
>  	    sbp->sb_dblocks > XFS_MAX_DBLOCKS(sbp)			||
>  	    sbp->sb_dblocks < XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(sbp)			||
> -	    sbp->sb_shared_vn != 0)) {
> +	    sbp->sb_shared_vn != 0					||
> +	    sbp->sb_fdblocks > sbp->sb_dblocks				||
> +	    sbp->sb_ifree > sbp->sb_icount)) {

Hmm.  On its face this seems reasonable for the superblock verifier, but
then I started wondering, since these are /summary/ counters.

If the free counts are off by this much, the admin won't be able to
mount the fs, and xfs_repair is the only other tool that can fix the
summary counts.  However, if the log is dirty, the mount won't succeed
to recover the fs, which is too bad since we can reinitialize the
summary counts after log recovery.  xfs_repair -L will be the only way
out, which will wreak havoc on the filesystem from discarding the log
contents.

So, would it be preferable to split this into two parts?  For example,
have this as a corruption check in _sb_write_verify to prevent us from
writing out garbage counters and a clamp in _reinit_percpu_counters so
that we never present ridiculous free counts to users?

(Does any of this make sense with !haslazysbcount filesystems?)

Bonus question: What about checking frextents/rextents?

--D

>  		xfs_notice(mp, "SB sanity check failed");
>  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-13 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-13 13:10 [PATCH] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-07-13 20:06   ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 23:43   ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-17 17:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-16 19:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17  9:17   ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-07-17 17:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 17:17     ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 19:12       ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 20:33         ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 23:26           ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-18 20:07             ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 21:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 21:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-25 21:58     ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 22:48   ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-25 22:55     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v4] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 17:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:19     ` Bill O'Donnell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180713164153.GM32415@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=billodo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).