From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:33:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725213336.16263-1-billodo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713131003.31121-1-billodo@redhat.com>
Current sb verifier doesn't check bounds on sb_fdblocks and sb_ifree.
Add sanity checks for these parameters.
Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
---
v3: eliminate need for additional write_flag, doing those
unique checks in xfs_sb_write_verify()
v2: make extra sanity checks exclusive to writes
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index b3ad15956366..f583fb8a10e1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -599,22 +599,16 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
static int
xfs_sb_verify(
struct xfs_buf *bp,
+ struct xfs_sb *sb,
bool check_version)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
- struct xfs_sb sb;
-
- /*
- * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
- * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
- */
- __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
/*
* Only check the in progress field for the primary superblock as
* mkfs.xfs doesn't clear it from secondary superblocks.
*/
- return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb,
+ return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, sb,
bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR,
check_version);
}
@@ -637,6 +631,7 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_dsb *dsb = XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp);
+ struct xfs_sb sb;
int error;
/*
@@ -657,7 +652,13 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
}
}
}
- error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
+ * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
+ */
+ __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
+ error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, true);
out_error:
if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED || error == -EFSBADCRC)
@@ -693,9 +694,26 @@ xfs_sb_write_verify(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item;
+ struct xfs_sb sb;
int error;
- error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, false);
+ /*
+ * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
+ * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
+ */
+ __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
+
+ error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, false);
+
+ /* Additional sb sanity checks for writes */
+ if (!error) {
+ if (sb.sb_fdblocks > sb.sb_dblocks ||
+ sb.sb_ifree > sb.sb_icount) {
+ xfs_notice(mp, "SB sanity check failed");
+ error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ }
+ }
+
if (error) {
xfs_verifier_error(bp, error, __this_address);
return;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 13:10 [PATCH] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-13 20:06 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-17 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-16 19:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 9:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-07-17 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 17:17 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 19:12 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 20:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-18 20:07 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 21:33 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2018-07-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-25 21:58 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 22:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-25 22:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v4] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 17:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:19 ` Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725213336.16263-1-billodo@redhat.com \
--to=billodo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).