linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: re-enable FIBMAP on reflink; disable for swap
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:02:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180830180204.GC2853@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65e818f2-885d-50a4-0d4a-7700c703c2af@sandeen.net>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/30/18 11:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:31:40AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> That's no reason to uniquely disallow it for reflinked files, though;
> >> the problem is universal.  It's true for fiemap as well.  So I'm not sure
> >> that's an argument against the patch?
> > 
> > fiemap at least tells you an extent is shared, bmap does not.
> 
> yes, so bmap is clearly the wrong interface to use if you want to
> write directly to a file's blocks.  But if you know enough to check
> the fiemap shared flag, you know enough to not use fibmap for that purpose...
> 

FWIW, this patch seems reasonable to me. To Christoph's point, I don't
think either interface really grants license to write to the underlying
blocks, so either way it's technically being abused for this purpose.
Unless there's a clear way to return an error for a particular type of
file, I think it's reasonable behavior for fibmap to expose the data it
supports (i.e., block maps) and drop the data it doesn't (reflink
state).

Brian

> -Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-30 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-30 16:10 [PATCH, RFC] xfs: re-enable FIBMAP on reflink; disable for swap Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-30 16:31   ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 16:36     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-30 16:35       ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 18:02         ` Brian Foster [this message]
2018-08-30 18:28           ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-30 18:51             ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 19:39               ` Brian Foster
2018-08-30 19:47                 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 19:58                   ` Brian Foster
2018-08-31  0:11               ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-31  1:34                 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-31  3:05                   ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-31 13:08                     ` Eric Sandeen
2018-09-01  8:32                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31  6:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 12:36               ` Brian Foster
2018-09-01  8:31                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-02 14:08                 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-09-02 17:52                   ` Eric Sandeen
2018-09-03 10:21                     ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180830180204.GC2853@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).