From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: re-enable FIBMAP on reflink; disable for swap
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:02:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180830180204.GC2853@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65e818f2-885d-50a4-0d4a-7700c703c2af@sandeen.net>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/30/18 11:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:31:40AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> That's no reason to uniquely disallow it for reflinked files, though;
> >> the problem is universal. It's true for fiemap as well. So I'm not sure
> >> that's an argument against the patch?
> >
> > fiemap at least tells you an extent is shared, bmap does not.
>
> yes, so bmap is clearly the wrong interface to use if you want to
> write directly to a file's blocks. But if you know enough to check
> the fiemap shared flag, you know enough to not use fibmap for that purpose...
>
FWIW, this patch seems reasonable to me. To Christoph's point, I don't
think either interface really grants license to write to the underlying
blocks, so either way it's technically being abused for this purpose.
Unless there's a clear way to return an error for a particular type of
file, I think it's reasonable behavior for fibmap to expose the data it
supports (i.e., block maps) and drop the data it doesn't (reflink
state).
Brian
> -Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 16:10 [PATCH, RFC] xfs: re-enable FIBMAP on reflink; disable for swap Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-30 16:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-30 16:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 18:02 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2018-08-30 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-08-30 18:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 19:39 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-30 19:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-30 19:58 ` Brian Foster
2018-08-31 0:11 ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-31 1:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-08-31 3:05 ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-31 13:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-09-01 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2018-09-01 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-02 14:08 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-09-02 17:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-09-03 10:21 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180830180204.GC2853@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).