linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] xfs: don't unlock invalidated buf on aborted tx commit
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:21:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831132119.GB39825@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831072437.GA7079@infradead.org>

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:24:37AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	trace_xfs_buf_item_unlock(bip);
> 
> Can we keep an empty line between the variable declarations and the
> trace call?
> 

Sure.

> > +	freed = atomic_dec_and_test(&bip->bli_refcount);
> > +	if (freed) {
> > +		ASSERT(!aborted || XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(lip->li_mountp));
> > +		/*
> > +		 * An aborted item may be in the AIL regardless of dirty state.
> > +		 * For example, consider an aborted transaction that invalidated
> > +		 * a dirty bli and cleared the dirty state.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (aborted)
> >  			xfs_trans_ail_remove(lip, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
> > +		if (aborted || !dirty)
> >  			xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
> > +	} else if (stale) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Stale buffers remain locked until final unpin unless the bli
> > +		 * was freed in the branch above. A freed stale bli implies an
> > +		 * abort because buffer invalidation dirties the bli and
> > +		 * transaction.
> > +		 */
> > +		ASSERT(!freed);
> 
> This assert doesn't make sense as we're already in the else statement
> of the 'if (freed) check.
> 

It was intended to be defensive. I actually considered 'else if (freed
&& stale)' so the code was more clear, but settled on this (which is
eventually replaced).

> > +		return;
> >  	}
> > +	ASSERT(!stale || (aborted && freed));
> 
> This assert still look a little odd to me because it duplicates so
> much of the above logic.  Why not:
> 

Just optimizing out the freed variable doesn't eliminate the need for
the assert. freed is defined because I wanted an assert to check the
expected state where we consider an unlock. I wanted the assert because
the situation is non-trivial with regard to handling unlocks of stale
buffers in this path. To simplify this is partly the purpose of the
following patches, which also tweak this assert and replace the rest of
the code you've changed.

Brian

> 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bip->bli_refcount)) {
> 		/*
> 		 * An aborted item may be in the AIL regardless of dirty state.
> 		 * For example, consider an aborted transaction that invalidated
> 		 * a dirty bli and cleared the dirty state.
> 		 */
> 		if (aborted) {
> 			ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(lip->li_mountp));
>   			xfs_trans_ail_remove(lip, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
>  			xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
> 		} else {
> 			ASSERT(!stale);
> 			if (!dirty)
>  				xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
> 		}
> 	} else if (stale) {
> 		/*
> 		 * Stale buffers remain locked until final unpin unless the bli
> 		 * was freed in the branch above. A freed stale bli implies an
> 		 * abort because buffer invalidation dirties the bli and
> 		 * transaction.
> 		 */
> 		return;
> 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29 17:26 [PATCH v3 0/3] xfs: bli refcount fixups Brian Foster
2018-08-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] xfs: don't unlock invalidated buf on aborted tx commit Brian Foster
2018-08-31  7:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 13:21     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2018-09-01 11:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-03  0:18         ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] xfs: clean up xfs_trans_brelse() Brian Foster
2018-08-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] xfs: refactor xfs_buf_log_item reference count handling Brian Foster
2018-08-31  7:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 13:22     ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180831132119.GB39825@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).