From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:49032 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726477AbeI0F5n (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 01:57:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:41:46 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] docs: carry a copy of the CC-by-SA 3.0 license Message-ID: <20180926234146.GA20086@magnolia> References: <153799045443.31202.17537455000771265705.stgit@magnolia> <153799046767.31202.13234065186281153272.stgit@magnolia> <20180926213028.GA22763@infradead.org> <20180926232140.GE31060@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180926232140.GE31060@dastard> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Dave Chinner , b@magnolia Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 09:21:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:34:27PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > > > Add the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license so that the XFS Data Structures & > > > Algorithms book can reference it with spdx headers. > > > > NAK. We should not add random new licenses to the kernel tree. > > Given these patches are all CC-BY-SA-3.0+ (i.e. they have an "or > later" clause in them), and the kernel already has > LICENSES/other/CC-BY-SA-4.0, why not just put them under the license > that the kernel already supports? Ok, will do. I'll repost the whole thing w/ changed SPDX headers if I don't hear anything else. :) --D > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com