linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 08:39:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002153903.GD6706@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002123429.GA55077@bfoster>

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 08:34:30AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:48:22PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > In xrep_findroot_block, if we find a candidate root block with sibling
> > pointers or sibling blocks on the same tree level, we should not return
> > that block as a tree root because root blocks cannot have siblings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> > index 9f08dd9bf1d5..6eb66b3543ff 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> ...
> > @@ -735,18 +736,52 @@ xrep_findroot_block(
> >  		goto out;
> >  	bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
> >  
> > -	/* Ignore this block if it's lower in the tree than we've seen. */
> > -	if (fab->root != NULLAGBLOCK &&
> > -	    xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) < fab->height)
> > -		goto out;
> > -
> >  	/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */
> >  	bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
> >  	if (bp->b_error)
> >  		goto out;
> > -	fab->root = agbno;
> > -	fab->height = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) + 1;
> > -	*found_it = true;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree
> > +	 * type.  We don't need the caller to try the other tree types.
> > +	 */
> > +	*done_with_block = true;
> > +
> > +	block_level = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock);
> > +	if (block_level + 1 == fab->height) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * This block claims to be at the same level as the root we
> > +		 * found previously.  There can't be two candidate roots, so
> > +		 * we'll throw away both of them and hope we later find a block
> > +		 * even higher in the tree.
> > +		 */
> > +		fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	} else if (block_level < fab->height) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * This block is lower in the tree than the root we found
> > +		 * previously, so just ignore it.
> > +		 */
> 
> Nit: can we combine these two comments into one above the whole if/else
> statement? It makes the code slightly more readable than multi-line
> comments in each branch, IMO. E.g.:
> 
>         /*
>          * Compare the current block level with the height of the current
>          * candidate root block. If the level matches the current candidate,
>          * we know the current candidate can't be a root so we must invalidate
>          * it. If the level is lower than the current candidate, just ignore
>          * this block.
>          */
>         block_level = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock);
>         if (block_level + 1 == fab->height) {
>                 fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
>                 goto out;
>         } else if (block_level < fab->height) {
>                 goto out;
>         }
> 
> With that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

Done; thanks for the review!

--D

> 
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This is the highest block in the tree that we've found so far.
> > +	 * Update the btree height to reflect what we've learned from this
> > +	 * block.
> > +	 */
> > +	fab->height = block_level + 1;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If this block doesn't have sibling pointers, then it's the new root
> > +	 * block candidate.  Otherwise, the root will be found farther up the
> > +	 * tree.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (btblock->bb_u.s.bb_leftsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK) &&
> > +	    btblock->bb_u.s.bb_rightsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK))
> > +		fab->root = agbno;
> > +	else
> > +		fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
> >  
> >  	trace_xrep_findroot_block(mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno,
> >  			be32_to_cpu(btblock->bb_magic), fab->height - 1);
> > @@ -768,7 +803,7 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
> >  	struct xrep_findroot		*ri = priv;
> >  	struct xrep_find_ag_btree	*fab;
> >  	xfs_agblock_t			b;
> > -	bool				found_it;
> > +	bool				done;
> >  	int				error = 0;
> >  
> >  	/* Ignore anything that isn't AG metadata. */
> > @@ -777,16 +812,16 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
> >  
> >  	/* Otherwise scan each block + btree type. */
> >  	for (b = 0; b < rec->rm_blockcount; b++) {
> > -		found_it = false;
> > +		done = false;
> >  		for (fab = ri->btree_info; fab->buf_ops; fab++) {
> >  			if (rec->rm_owner != fab->rmap_owner)
> >  				continue;
> >  			error = xrep_findroot_block(ri, fab,
> >  					rec->rm_owner, rec->rm_startblock + b,
> > -					&found_it);
> > +					&done);
> >  			if (error)
> >  				return error;
> > -			if (found_it)
> > +			if (done)
> >  				break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-02 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-01 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] xfs-4.20: scrub fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-02 12:34   ` Brian Foster
2018-10-02 15:39     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-03  2:01   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 22:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-02 12:36   ` Brian Foster
2018-10-02 19:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-03 11:03       ` Brian Foster
2018-10-03  2:02   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-03 11:05     ` Brian Foster
2018-10-04 22:15       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 10:27         ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181002153903.GD6706@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).