From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 08:39:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002153903.GD6706@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002123429.GA55077@bfoster>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 08:34:30AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:48:22PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > In xrep_findroot_block, if we find a candidate root block with sibling
> > pointers or sibling blocks on the same tree level, we should not return
> > that block as a tree root because root blocks cannot have siblings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> > index 9f08dd9bf1d5..6eb66b3543ff 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> ...
> > @@ -735,18 +736,52 @@ xrep_findroot_block(
> > goto out;
> > bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
> >
> > - /* Ignore this block if it's lower in the tree than we've seen. */
> > - if (fab->root != NULLAGBLOCK &&
> > - xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) < fab->height)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > /* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */
> > bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
> > if (bp->b_error)
> > goto out;
> > - fab->root = agbno;
> > - fab->height = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) + 1;
> > - *found_it = true;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree
> > + * type. We don't need the caller to try the other tree types.
> > + */
> > + *done_with_block = true;
> > +
> > + block_level = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock);
> > + if (block_level + 1 == fab->height) {
> > + /*
> > + * This block claims to be at the same level as the root we
> > + * found previously. There can't be two candidate roots, so
> > + * we'll throw away both of them and hope we later find a block
> > + * even higher in the tree.
> > + */
> > + fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
> > + goto out;
> > + } else if (block_level < fab->height) {
> > + /*
> > + * This block is lower in the tree than the root we found
> > + * previously, so just ignore it.
> > + */
>
> Nit: can we combine these two comments into one above the whole if/else
> statement? It makes the code slightly more readable than multi-line
> comments in each branch, IMO. E.g.:
>
> /*
> * Compare the current block level with the height of the current
> * candidate root block. If the level matches the current candidate,
> * we know the current candidate can't be a root so we must invalidate
> * it. If the level is lower than the current candidate, just ignore
> * this block.
> */
> block_level = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock);
> if (block_level + 1 == fab->height) {
> fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
> goto out;
> } else if (block_level < fab->height) {
> goto out;
> }
>
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Done; thanks for the review!
--D
>
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * This is the highest block in the tree that we've found so far.
> > + * Update the btree height to reflect what we've learned from this
> > + * block.
> > + */
> > + fab->height = block_level + 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If this block doesn't have sibling pointers, then it's the new root
> > + * block candidate. Otherwise, the root will be found farther up the
> > + * tree.
> > + */
> > + if (btblock->bb_u.s.bb_leftsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK) &&
> > + btblock->bb_u.s.bb_rightsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK))
> > + fab->root = agbno;
> > + else
> > + fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
> >
> > trace_xrep_findroot_block(mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno,
> > be32_to_cpu(btblock->bb_magic), fab->height - 1);
> > @@ -768,7 +803,7 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
> > struct xrep_findroot *ri = priv;
> > struct xrep_find_ag_btree *fab;
> > xfs_agblock_t b;
> > - bool found_it;
> > + bool done;
> > int error = 0;
> >
> > /* Ignore anything that isn't AG metadata. */
> > @@ -777,16 +812,16 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
> >
> > /* Otherwise scan each block + btree type. */
> > for (b = 0; b < rec->rm_blockcount; b++) {
> > - found_it = false;
> > + done = false;
> > for (fab = ri->btree_info; fab->buf_ops; fab++) {
> > if (rec->rm_owner != fab->rmap_owner)
> > continue;
> > error = xrep_findroot_block(ri, fab,
> > rec->rm_owner, rec->rm_startblock + b,
> > - &found_it);
> > + &done);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> > - if (found_it)
> > + if (done)
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-02 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] xfs-4.20: scrub fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-02 12:34 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-02 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-03 2:01 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-01 22:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-02 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-02 19:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-03 11:03 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-03 2:02 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-03 11:05 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-04 22:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 10:27 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181002153903.GD6706@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).