linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] xfs: refactor clonerange preparation into a separate helper
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:06:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005170652.GT19324@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005052809.GB12041@dastard>

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:28:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:44:47PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Refactor all the reflink preparation steps into a separate helper that
> > we'll use to land all the upcoming fixes for insufficient input checks.
> 
> If I've read the patch right, this also changes the location of the
> page cache truncation, right?  i.e. it now happens in the
> xfs_reflink_remap_prep() function instead of after the remap?  I
> think the commit message needs to mention that because it's a fix to
> incorrect behaviour....

Right.  Sorry I forgot to put that in the changelog.

> I've added:
> 
> --
> This rework also moves the invalidation of the destination range to
> the prep function so that it is done before the range is remapped.
> This ensures that nobody can access the data in range being remapped
> until the remap is complete.
> --
> 
> Sound OK?

Yep.

--D


> Otherwise this looks fine.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> -Dave.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > index 38f405415b88..80ca9b6793cd 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > @@ -1195,11 +1195,33 @@ xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Unlock both inodes after they've been prepped for a range clone. */
> > +STATIC void
> > +xfs_reflink_remap_unlock(
> > +	struct file		*file_in,
> > +	struct file		*file_out)
> > +{
> > +	struct inode		*inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
> > +	struct xfs_inode	*src = XFS_I(inode_in);
> > +	struct inode		*inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> > +	struct xfs_inode	*dest = XFS_I(inode_out);
> > +	bool			same_inode = (inode_in == inode_out);
> > +
> > +	xfs_iunlock(dest, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> > +	if (!same_inode)
> > +		xfs_iunlock(src, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> > +	inode_unlock(inode_out);
> > +	if (!same_inode)
> > +		inode_unlock_shared(inode_in);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> > - * Link a range of blocks from one file to another.
> > + * Prepare two files for range cloning.  Upon a successful return both inodes
> > + * will have the iolock and mmaplock held, the page cache of the out file
> > + * will be truncated, and any leases on the out file will have been broken.
> >   */
> > -int
> > -xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_reflink_remap_prep(
> >  	struct file		*file_in,
> >  	loff_t			pos_in,
> >  	struct file		*file_out,
> > @@ -1211,19 +1233,9 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> >  	struct xfs_inode	*src = XFS_I(inode_in);
> >  	struct inode		*inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> >  	struct xfs_inode	*dest = XFS_I(inode_out);
> > -	struct xfs_mount	*mp = src->i_mount;
> >  	bool			same_inode = (inode_in == inode_out);
> > -	xfs_fileoff_t		sfsbno, dfsbno;
> > -	xfs_filblks_t		fsblen;
> > -	xfs_extlen_t		cowextsize;
> >  	ssize_t			ret;
> >  
> > -	if (!xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb))
> > -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -
> > -	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> > -		return -EIO;
> > -
> >  	/* Lock both files against IO */
> >  	ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(inode_in, inode_out);
> >  	if (ret)
> > @@ -1254,8 +1266,6 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >  
> > -	trace_xfs_reflink_remap_range(src, pos_in, len, dest, pos_out);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Clear out post-eof preallocations because we don't have page cache
> >  	 * backing the delayed allocations and they'll never get freed on
> > @@ -1272,6 +1282,51 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >  
> > +	/* Zap any page cache for the destination file's range. */
> > +	truncate_inode_pages_range(&inode_out->i_data, pos_out,
> > +				   PAGE_ALIGN(pos_out + len) - 1);
> > +	return 0;
> > +out_unlock:
> > +	xfs_reflink_remap_unlock(file_in, file_out);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Link a range of blocks from one file to another.
> > + */
> > +int
> > +xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> > +	struct file		*file_in,
> > +	loff_t			pos_in,
> > +	struct file		*file_out,
> > +	loff_t			pos_out,
> > +	u64			len,
> > +	bool			is_dedupe)
> > +{
> > +	struct inode		*inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
> > +	struct xfs_inode	*src = XFS_I(inode_in);
> > +	struct inode		*inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> > +	struct xfs_inode	*dest = XFS_I(inode_out);
> > +	struct xfs_mount	*mp = src->i_mount;
> > +	xfs_fileoff_t		sfsbno, dfsbno;
> > +	xfs_filblks_t		fsblen;
> > +	xfs_extlen_t		cowextsize;
> > +	ssize_t			ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb))
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +
> > +	/* Prepare and then clone file data. */
> > +	ret = xfs_reflink_remap_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> > +			len, is_dedupe);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	trace_xfs_reflink_remap_range(src, pos_in, len, dest, pos_out);
> > +
> >  	dfsbno = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, pos_out);
> >  	sfsbno = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, pos_in);
> >  	fsblen = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, len);
> > @@ -1280,10 +1335,6 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >  
> > -	/* Zap any page cache for the destination file's range. */
> > -	truncate_inode_pages_range(&inode_out->i_data, pos_out,
> > -				   PAGE_ALIGN(pos_out + len) - 1);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Carry the cowextsize hint from src to dest if we're sharing the
> >  	 * entire source file to the entire destination file, the source file
> > @@ -1300,12 +1351,7 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_range(
> >  			is_dedupe);
> >  
> >  out_unlock:
> > -	xfs_iunlock(dest, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> > -	if (!same_inode)
> > -		xfs_iunlock(src, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> > -	inode_unlock(inode_out);
> > -	if (!same_inode)
> > -		inode_unlock_shared(inode_in);
> > +	xfs_reflink_remap_unlock(file_in, file_out);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		trace_xfs_reflink_remap_range_error(dest, ret, _RET_IP_);
> >  	return ret;
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-06  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05  0:44 [PATCH 00/15] fs: fixes for serious clone/dedupe problems Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:44 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: add a per-xfs trace_printk macro Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:44 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: refactor clonerange preparation into a separate helper Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  5:28   ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-05 17:06     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-06 10:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  7:02   ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-05  9:02     ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-05 17:21       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 23:42         ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-05  0:44 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: zero posteof blocks when cloning above eof Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  5:28   ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-06 10:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: update ctime and remove suid before cloning files Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  5:30   ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-06 10:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 05/15] vfs: check file ranges " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-06 10:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 06/15] vfs: strengthen checking of file range inputs to clone/dedupe range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  6:10   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-05 17:36     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 07/15] vfs: skip zero-length dedupe requests Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  8:39   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-06 10:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 08/15] vfs: change clone and dedupe range function pointers to return bytes completed Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  8:06   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-05 21:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-06 10:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08 18:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 09/15] vfs: pass operation flags to {clone, dedupe}_file_range implementations Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  7:07   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-05 17:50     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-06 10:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 10/15] vfs: make cloning to source file eof more explicit Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  6:47   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-05  0:45 ` [PATCH 11/15] vfs: allow short clone and dedupe operations Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 12/15] vfs: implement opportunistic short dedupe Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  6:40   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-05 17:42     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 13/15] ocfs2: truncate page cache for clone destination file before remapping Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 14/15] ocfs2: support partial clone range and dedupe range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: support returning partial reflink results Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05  1:17 ` [PATCH 00/15] fs: fixes for serious clone/dedupe problems Dave Chinner
2018-10-05  1:24   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181005170652.GT19324@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).