From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: move the define for superblock magic to uapi
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 11:17:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005181726.GZ19324@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005181032.pal6fwt7ebijvqu4@angband.pl>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:10:32PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 09:06:00AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 02:27:41PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Needed by users of fstatfs().
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > The XFS superblock magic number is part of the on-disk format definition
> > of XFS. It belongs with all the other on-disk format definitions in this
> > file.
> >
> > I don't think it's a good idea for userspace to associate s_magic with
> > userspace API feature sets, though the cat's long escaped the bag on
> > that one.
> >
> > With that being reality, "the XFS superblock magic number" has a
> > different semantic meaning than "the agreed upon statfs.f_type value for
> > XFS", which means the latter should have a different symbol name to
> > reflect that difference.
>
> Ie, you'd be ok with the same value to be defined in two places -- do I
> understand this right?
I'd be fine with it, but let's see what the other XFS maintainers think.
I still don't like the practice of inferring behaviors from magic
numbers, but at least we'd decouple the disk format from the UABI. :)
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > > -#define XFS_SB_MAGIC 0x58465342 /* 'XFSB' */
> > > +#define XFS_SB_MAGIC XFS_SUPER_MAGIC /* 0x58465342 = 'XFSB' */
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/magic.h
> > > #define JFFS2_SUPER_MAGIC 0x72b6
> > > +#define XFS_SUPER_MAGIC 0x58465342 /* "XFSB" */
> > > #define PSTOREFS_MAGIC 0x6165676C
You'd change xfs_fs_fill_super and xfs_fs_statfs too, right?
--D
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 10 people enter a bar: 1 who understands binary,
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ 1 who doesn't, D who prefer to write it as hex,
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ and 1 who narrowly avoided an off-by-one error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-06 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-05 12:27 [PATCH] xfs: move the define for superblock magic to uapi Adam Borowski
2018-10-05 16:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 18:10 ` Adam Borowski
2018-10-05 18:17 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-05 18:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: add a define for statfs " Adam Borowski
2018-10-08 22:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181005181726.GZ19324@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).