From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:54782 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726505AbeJFICe (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2018 04:02:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 19:01:20 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery Message-ID: <20181005190120.5a08c573@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20181006005154.GM12041@dastard> References: <153862669110.26427.16504658853992750743.stgit@magnolia> <20181006005154.GM12041@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Dave Chinner Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this > point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20 > merge window. If not, we'll go back to the drawing board.... I remain pretty concerned about it, to tell the truth. Rather than continue to guess, though, I've called for help, and will be talking with the LF lawyer about this next Thursday. Before then, I can't say anything except "I don't think this works..." Will let you know what I hear. jon